From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: jewel 10.2.4 freeze Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:42:17 +0200 Message-ID: <580E1DC9.1010803@dachary.org> References: <580E1C53.6060503@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:45096 "EHLO relay3-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751292AbcJXOmW (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:42:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <580E1C53.6060503@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Abhishek L Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek Varshney On 24/10/2016 16:36, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Abhishek, > > If we were to freeze jewel 10.2.4 today it would have 115 backports[0]. Do you think it we should stop merging new backports and prepare for the release ? If so, I'll ask the lead of each component to make sure nothing is missing from their point of view. s/it we/we/ > You can find the progress of the jewel 10.2.4 release in the ttp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487. s/in the ttp/in http/ > Cheers > > [0] issues backported and merged in jewel 10.2.4 http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/524 -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre