From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: rgw backports Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:52:42 +0200 Message-ID: <580F2B6A.50509@dachary.org> References: <57FF63DD.1090806@dachary.org> <1276006469.22059372.1477362126674.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:59416 "EHLO relay6-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932843AbcJYJws (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:52:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1276006469.22059372.1477362126674.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Matt Benjamin Cc: Ceph Development On 25/10/2016 04:22, Matt Benjamin wrote: > Hi Loic, > > Sorry about the late response. Looks like you resolved the first two. Drilling into 3, does the lack of conditional -lldap obstruct automake build? Apparently not? It looks like it's not a blocker indeed :-) Cheers > Regards, > > Matt > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Loic Dachary" >> To: "Matt Benjamin" >> Cc: "Ceph Development" >> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:37:17 AM >> Subject: rgw backports >> >> Hi Matt, >> >> The following jewel backports >> >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17322 >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17319 >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17313 >> >> conflict when trying to cherry-pick them and I would appreciate your advice >> on how to handle them. Should they be resolved or do you think the best >> action is to try to backport the commits that could prevent the conflict ? >> If you don't have an opinion it's also fine, I'll figure it out ;-) >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre