All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: agustin.benito@codethink.co.uk (Agustin Benito Bethencourt)
To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org
Subject: [cip-dev] f2f meeting at ELCE 2016 summary
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:33:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58175643.30607@codethink.co.uk> (raw)

Dear CIP friends,

At ELCE Thursday Oct 13th, the CIP group had a f2f meeting. After having 
lunch together, Board members met for about an hour. After that the rest 
of the members joined and discussed the following topics for over an hour:

++ 4.4 kernel repository

* During the event was announced that the first CIP kernel will be 4.4. 
At the meeting we clarified where to have the repository for that kernel.
** In the past, we reached the consensus to stay as close to the kernel 
community as possible. Following this approach, there is a consensus at 
CIP on using kernel.org as the working place for the kernel. The Linux 
Foundation fully supports this decision.

* The general idea is to have the working repositories where it make 
sense and mirror them all in a central place.

* CIP will use by default the Linux kernel tools/process to 
submit/review patches.
** We are currently discussing the general maintainership policies.

++ Other tools. Repositories mirrors

* As mirroring tool we will use Gitlab (as a service for now).
** As a key advantage it was stated that this tool can be set behind the 
firewall which for big corporations can make a difference in getting 
internal traction towards working in the open. Feature wise, Gitlab has 
what CIP needs.

* Gitlab will be use for additional required software beyond the kernel.
** When the account is set up, we will announce it.

++ CIP platforms

* The goal of the discussion was to find a common ground we all can 
share, assuming each member will focus most of their energy on those 
platforms used in production.

* CIP basic requirements for selecting a platform:
** At least one ARM and one Intel board
** At least one low cost development board for each architecture.
** No matter what CIP chooses, the list can be increased when consensus 
is reached.
** If any SoC joins CIP, we will obviously strongly consider adding 
their boards to the list.

* The boards selected at this point are:
** Beaglebone Black (TI Sitara 335x). This is a low cost board we 
reached consensus upon.
** Altera Cyclone V. CIP will figure out some details about how to 
handle off-tree code from it.

* The discussion around other boards is still ongoing.

++ Delivery (release) model

* When do we plan to release the platform? How?
** Agustin Benito Bethencourt (Codethink) will present a proposal to CIP 
about this to start the discussion.

++ Whitepaper

* Since CIP was announced, in April 2016, the Group has reached 
consensus in several fundamental topics. For this reason, we agreed to
write a Whitepaper to describe the current status and considerations of 
the CIP project.

* Current main consensus points are summarised in the CIP slides 
presented at various events. The idea is to move from there to a document.

* CIP group will start working on this topic as soon as possible.

++ 2017 CIP roadmap

* In order to define 2017 activity, CIP decided to pick up some key 
dates an plan milestones around them.
** Consensus was reached around  ELC, LinuxCon Japan and ELCE, based on 
the experience from 2016.

Best Regards
-- 
Agustin Benito Bethencourt
Principal Consultant - FOSS at Codethink
agustin.benito at codethink.co.uk

             reply	other threads:[~2016-10-31 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-31 14:33 Agustin Benito Bethencourt [this message]
2016-11-03  9:45 ` [cip-dev] f2f meeting at ELCE 2016 summary Agustin Benito Bethencourt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58175643.30607@codethink.co.uk \
    --to=agustin.benito@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.