From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alim Akhtar Subject: Re: [4/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove unused soc_is_exynos{4,5} Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 19:01:02 +0530 Message-ID: <581C8D96.4040507@samsung.com> References: <1478230764-13748-5-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:32858 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761081AbcKDNcq (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2016 09:32:46 -0400 Received: from epcas2p4.samsung.com (unknown [182.195.41.56]) by mailout3.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014)) with ESMTP id <0OG4018FSDMIXR70@mailout3.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 22:32:42 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: <1478230764-13748-5-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Pankaj Dubey , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: krzk@kernel.org, kgene@kernel.org, thomas.ab@samsung.com Hi Pankaj, On 11/04/2016 09:09 AM, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > As no more user of soc_is_exynos{4,5} we can safely remove them. > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey > --- Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar Also I have complied tested this series, looks good. > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h > index 9424a8a..d19064b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h > @@ -105,11 +105,6 @@ IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5800, EXYNOS5800_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK) > # define soc_is_exynos5800() 0 > #endif > > -#define soc_is_exynos4() (soc_is_exynos4210() || soc_is_exynos4212() || \ > - soc_is_exynos4412()) > -#define soc_is_exynos5() (soc_is_exynos5250() || soc_is_exynos5410() || \ > - soc_is_exynos5420() || soc_is_exynos5800()) > - > extern u32 cp15_save_diag; > extern u32 cp15_save_power; > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alim.akhtar@samsung.com (Alim Akhtar) Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 19:01:02 +0530 Subject: [4/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove unused soc_is_exynos{4,5} In-Reply-To: <1478230764-13748-5-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> References: <1478230764-13748-5-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> Message-ID: <581C8D96.4040507@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Pankaj, On 11/04/2016 09:09 AM, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > As no more user of soc_is_exynos{4,5} we can safely remove them. > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey > --- Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar Also I have complied tested this series, looks good. > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h > index 9424a8a..d19064b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h > @@ -105,11 +105,6 @@ IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5800, EXYNOS5800_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK) > # define soc_is_exynos5800() 0 > #endif > > -#define soc_is_exynos4() (soc_is_exynos4210() || soc_is_exynos4212() || \ > - soc_is_exynos4412()) > -#define soc_is_exynos5() (soc_is_exynos5250() || soc_is_exynos5410() || \ > - soc_is_exynos5420() || soc_is_exynos5800()) > - > extern u32 cp15_save_diag; > extern u32 cp15_save_power; > >