From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Ledford Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-core 0/8] libpvrdma: userspace library for PVRDMA Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 15:24:17 -0600 Message-ID: <581E4E01.5020405@redhat.com> References: <1478216677-6150-1-git-send-email-aditr@vmware.com> <20161104004620.GA30318@obsidianresearch.com> <20161105150307.GB23803@obsidianresearch.com> <20161105173815.GA28539@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3UOl0vHV6kVk2KGenOG8n21HWdAkxjcws" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161105173815.GA28539-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Christoph Hellwig , Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Adit Ranadive , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , pv-drivers List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --3UOl0vHV6kVk2KGenOG8n21HWdAkxjcws Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Gfea0iE3oExE3bGoIuQom51qKn6DQxqfn"; protected-headers="v1" From: Doug Ledford To: Christoph Hellwig , Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Adit Ranadive , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , pv-drivers Message-ID: <581E4E01.5020405-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-core 0/8] libpvrdma: userspace library for PVRDMA References: <1478216677-6150-1-git-send-email-aditr-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> <20161104004620.GA30318-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> <20161105150307.GB23803-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> <20161105173815.GA28539-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20161105173815.GA28539-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> --Gfea0iE3oExE3bGoIuQom51qKn6DQxqfn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/5/16 11:38 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 09:03:07AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> Oh, I wanted to ask about the name - we have two 'pv' drivers now, >> should this be called pvrdma_vmware or something? Is there a >> convention for this in other parts of the kernel? >=20 > Yes, it should, even if we have no exact convention. >=20 Agreed. I hate how long the driver name will end up being, but pvrdma_ as a prefix sounds appropriate. --=20 Doug Ledford GPG Key ID: 0E572FDD Red Hat, Inc. 100 E. Davie St Raleigh, NC 27601 USA --Gfea0iE3oExE3bGoIuQom51qKn6DQxqfn-- --3UOl0vHV6kVk2KGenOG8n21HWdAkxjcws Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYHk4BAAoJELgmozMOVy/d2SAP/i0hDccXJAXgqhHFDi8DkPco yZHJt+2B+m8lpK00ZZwCrctCDAJJqPyw5MH3EgBi6uor0TIMG53/GRNVNJGTtUXm Ga6Agv6v7y8JCdl0lwdt7wgPMDPk2l+OsJu7vI9xTP5AIyeI7TJTWlUhn146nGRY zy4TJVclQQqvXIvjMKMV7h/vWPl+URIHqLWq3G7RDHRosRzyKqHsYl30L/5TxNXS vEvJwAYLBt2JzaJQVIP3pyYtzvV/E/wMtwCrUBlrveMgYCCaCjYexLGKMTWWk9j7 c3tNIXatJ5SOWbrXJ9g9y7d9H3zDxDYt3+gCd6hLzLh/qwIx5X6FqKZmYYiLTavk 5Ob7ouDQgCitadz30YEgB1+AEtfLROfz84BpcviC54ES6uT3Aq3zGfgl+evugwF+ QNUmMPGKLxz/pEdxoCgVMD62fFLGYeGKyepbcRKD8Law/yT7GCxQYfm8hLAr91zl +oTlY78aSVpS79lufbT5i+BNe/081IIbEyJ/OTlMrqeG6vDAyx+UesHwjLs7yJhj q05gZUeXsC8BIOJoPA3V5LvByOHZAghMIWjbKlsyx45nwZqaA60hwIEf8GMVXRn9 /goGk2VnahM5gmhIN4YRfvlJeNSyStcrwBrbg1jcZ4ry7dCSWuD9lBUL25BdAtox L2m/ya+wcuYstHc3DU/2 =s3q+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3UOl0vHV6kVk2KGenOG8n21HWdAkxjcws-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html