From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "pankaj.dubey" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove smp_init_cpus hook from platsmp.c Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 09:07:42 +0530 Message-ID: <581FF706.3050502@samsung.com> References: <1478230764-13748-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <1478230764-13748-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <20161105154119.GA8183@kozik-lap> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout2.samsung.com ([203.254.224.25]:56306 "EHLO mailout2.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752132AbcKGDe4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Nov 2016 22:34:56 -0500 Received: from epcas2p1.samsung.com (unknown [182.195.41.53]) by mailout2.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014)) with ESMTP id <0OG901K6S5XQNZ70@mailout2.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 12:34:38 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: <20161105154119.GA8183@kozik-lap> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kgene@kernel.org, thomas.ab@samsung.com Hi Krzysztof, On Saturday 05 November 2016 09:11 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 09:09:21AM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: >> We can safely remove exynos_smp_init_cpus() hook from mach-exynos/platsmp.c, >> as all SMP platforms in mach-exynos can rely on DT for CPU core description >> instead of determining number of cores from the SCU. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 31 ------------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 31 deletions(-) >> > > > Thanks, applied. Somehow your patchset did not reach linux-samsung-soc's > Parchwork. I don't have a clue why... It is on linux-arm-kernel's > Patchwork. > Thanks for looking into this series. I am also not sure why its not reflecting for you on linux-samsung-soc's Patchwork, but I can see this series in linux-samsung-soc Patchwork at below links: [1/4]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9411787/ [2/4]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9411789/ [3/4]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9411791/ [4/4]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9411793/ Will you please review other two patches (3/4 and 4/4) in this series? Thanks, Pankaj Dubey > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pankaj.dubey@samsung.com (pankaj.dubey) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 09:07:42 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove smp_init_cpus hook from platsmp.c In-Reply-To: <20161105154119.GA8183@kozik-lap> References: <1478230764-13748-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <1478230764-13748-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <20161105154119.GA8183@kozik-lap> Message-ID: <581FF706.3050502@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Krzysztof, On Saturday 05 November 2016 09:11 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 09:09:21AM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: >> We can safely remove exynos_smp_init_cpus() hook from mach-exynos/platsmp.c, >> as all SMP platforms in mach-exynos can rely on DT for CPU core description >> instead of determining number of cores from the SCU. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 31 ------------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 31 deletions(-) >> > > > Thanks, applied. Somehow your patchset did not reach linux-samsung-soc's > Parchwork. I don't have a clue why... It is on linux-arm-kernel's > Patchwork. > Thanks for looking into this series. I am also not sure why its not reflecting for you on linux-samsung-soc's Patchwork, but I can see this series in linux-samsung-soc Patchwork at below links: [1/4]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9411787/ [2/4]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9411789/ [3/4]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9411791/ [4/4]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9411793/ Will you please review other two patches (3/4 and 4/4) in this series? Thanks, Pankaj Dubey > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > > >