From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: rados and the next jewel release v10.2.4 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:50:51 +0100 Message-ID: <582086BB.2030702@dachary.org> References: <5811C998.8010708@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:49374 "EHLO relay3-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752427AbcKGNu4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2016 08:50:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5811C998.8010708@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Samuel Just Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek Varshney For the record Sam, Josh and Kefu approved the branch on condition that a few pull requests are merged, the last of which went in today https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11679 On 27/10/2016 11:32, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Sam, > > The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rados suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-19 except for one rare transient failure http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15454). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? > > Cheers > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre