From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Young Subject: Use of snd_atomic_write_t for dshare and friends Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:29:29 +0000 Message-ID: <58209DD9.8060905@IEE.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF54266DE4 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:29:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id a197so189574923wmd.0 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 07:29:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.11.11] (13.110.6.51.dyn.plus.net. [51.6.110.13]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r72sm14120360wmd.21.2016.11.07.07.29.29 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Nov 2016 07:29:30 -0800 (PST) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Would it make sense for dshare, and other d-* plugins, to use a shared snd_atomic_write_t in the shared memory segment and associated snd_atomic_write_xxx() & snd_atomic_read_xxx() calls?