From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c52pm-0005SC-W7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:48:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c52pi-0007qc-5M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:48:59 -0500 Received: from [59.151.112.132] (port=18724 helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c52ph-0007qQ-PC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:48:54 -0500 References: <1478794177-29377-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20161110152921.58253387@t450s.home> <20161111003049-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20161110154828.73d2cbf9@t450s.home> <20161111005034-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <58253105.8060507@cn.fujitsu.com> <20161111053146-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> From: Cao jin Message-ID: <58254046.20309@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 11:51:34 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161111053146-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/47] virtio, vhost, pc, pci: tests, documentation, fixes and cleanups List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Alex Williamson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini , Felipe Franciosi On 11/11/2016 11:32 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:46:29AM +0800, Cao jin wrote: >> >> >> On 11/11/2016 06:51 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 03:48:28PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote: >> >>> >>> I think I'll drop this, this patchset was borderline useful anyway. >>> >> >> Really sorry for the issue, I moved usb_xhci_init() too far from its >> original place, results in the segmentation fault. >> >> Could I send new version of this patch to fix it right now? >> >> > > OK but I'd like to know which other patches > in the patchset are untested. You really must inform people > when you post untested patches. > I see, really sorry for my mistake. My patches just pass make check, didn't test for each patch. -- Yours Sincerely, Cao jin