From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Lebrun Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ipv6: sr: fix IPv6 initialization failure without lwtunnels Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:17:20 +0100 Message-ID: <582AE0B0.60006@uclouvain.be> References: <1478780813-20005-1-git-send-email-david.lebrun@uclouvain.be> <20161113.002055.1386089188095640295.davem@davemloft.net> <20161113.002348.81553025732356797.davem@davemloft.net> <5828C619.2020008@uclouvain.be> <5829C89B.7010405@cumulusnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4m6HOjo7fG7goEvo7w5QMd9Newmstunse" Cc: David Miller , , To: Roopa Prabhu Return-path: Received: from smtp.sgsi.ucl.ac.be ([130.104.5.67]:34670 "EHLO smtp1.sgsi.ucl.ac.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S941383AbcKOKP3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 05:15:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5829C89B.7010405@cumulusnetworks.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --4m6HOjo7fG7goEvo7w5QMd9Newmstunse Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/14/2016 03:22 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote: > I prefer option b). most LWTUNNEL encaps are done this way. >=20 > seg6 and seg6_iptunnel is new segment routing code and can be under > CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6 which depends on CONFIG_LWTUNNEL and CONFIG_IPV6. > CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_HMAC could then depend on CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6 Will do that, thanks David --4m6HOjo7fG7goEvo7w5QMd9Newmstunse Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAlgq4LAACgkQjbzn67sZ6ANHjgCgiP1e1jCVz8Rf/Ivneh2q8xX3 22gAniLqFPrqNhbWbfXVTX0aQWDaYYtz =JxTv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4m6HOjo7fG7goEvo7w5QMd9Newmstunse--