All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandra Yates <alexandra.yates at linux.intel.com>
To: powertop@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [Powertop] Package C states over Haswell platform
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 20:37:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58472.10.255.85.192.1414553854.squirrel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 002401cff2cb$1aeaebc0$50c0c340$@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3374 bytes --]


> Hi,
>
> I'm working on DELL E7440 platform (Haswell based) with dual OS: Windows
> 8.1
> and Ubuntu 14.04.1 (based on 3.13).
> When I use Win 8.1, using BLA I get ~90% PC7 when idle. However, when I
> use
> the Ubuntu, using powertop I get only as high as PC3.
> Since it's the same platform, it seems to rule out a HW issue. Any idea
> what
> can be the problem? Is Haswell fully supported by powertop?
>
>           Package   |             Core    |            CPU 0       CPU 2
>                     |                     | C0 active   0.2%        0.1%
>                     |                     | POLL        0.0%    0.0 ms
> 0.0%
> 0.0 ms
>                     |                     | C1E-HSW     0.0%    0.1 ms
> 0.0%
> 0.0 ms
> C2 (pc2)    0.1%    |                     |
> C3 (pc3)    3.7%    | C3 (cc3)    0.0%    | C3-HSW      0.0%    0.4 ms
> 0.0%
> 0.4 ms
> C6 (pc6)    0.0%    | C6 (cc6)    0.0%    | C6-HSW      0.0%    0.0 ms
> 0.0%
> 0.2 ms
> C7 (pc7)    0.0%    | C7 (cc7)   99.0%    | C7s-HSW     0.1%    0.9 ms
> 0.1%
> 1.8 ms
> C8 (pc8)    0.0%    |                     | C8-HSW      0.1%    1.4 ms
> 0.2%
> 2.5 ms
> C9 (pc9)    0.0%    |                     | C9-HSW      0.4%    4.0 ms
> 2.3%
> 8.0 ms
> C10 (pc10)  0.0%    |                     | C10-HSW    98.9%   44.5 ms
> 97.0%
> 36.5 ms
>
>                     |             Core    |            CPU 1       CPU 3
>                     |                     | C0 active   0.2%        0.1%
>                     |                     | POLL        0.0%    0.0 ms
> 0.0%
> 0.0 ms
>                     |                     | C1E-HSW     0.0%    0.0 ms
> 1.0%
> 50.1 ms
>                     |                     |
>                     | C3 (cc3)    0.0%    | C3-HSW      0.0%    0.7 ms
> 0.0%
> 0.6 ms
>                     | C6 (cc6)    0.0%    | C6-HSW      0.0%    0.5 ms
> 0.0%
> 0.0 ms
>                     | C7 (cc7)   98.0%    | C7s-HSW     0.1%    0.7 ms
> 0.4%
> 25.7 ms
>                     |                     | C8-HSW      0.0%    4.9 ms
> 0.0%
> 1.5 ms
>                     |                     | C9-HSW      0.6%    4.7 ms
> 0.7%
> 19.5 ms
>                     |                     | C10-HSW    98.5%   93.5 ms
> 97.8%
> 78.0 ms
>
>                     |             GPU     |
>                     |                     |
>                     | Powered On 12.1%    |
>                     | RC6        87.9%    |
>                     | RC6p        0.0%    |
>                     | RC6pp       0.0%    |
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Rony
>
> _______________________________________________
> PowerTop mailing list
> PowerTop(a)lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/powertop
>

Hi Rony,

Interesting you ask this since I presented at the Open source bridge
conference how to optimize your computer in terms of power using power
top, as an example I used a Haswell box with Ubuntu.  I also presented on
the Debian conference a similar talk using Debian distro.


There are few things that may be happening.

1- I would suggest to update to the latest kernel 3.17.  From 3.13 to 3.17
there have been few bug fixes that help linux in terms of power
management.

2-At the boot command line of your kernel add the following settings:



Thank you,
Alexandra.

             reply	other threads:[~2014-10-29  3:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-29  3:37 Alexandra Yates [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-29 12:23 [Powertop] Package C states over Haswell platform Rony Ross
2014-10-29  3:57 Alexandra Yates
2014-10-28 18:04 Kalowsky, Daniel
2014-10-28 16:45 Arjan van de Ven
2014-10-28 16:20 Rony Ross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58472.10.255.85.192.1414553854.squirrel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=powertop@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.