From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Andrew Zaborowski <andrew.zaborowski@intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] cfg80211: NL80211_ATTR_SOCKET_OWNER support for CMD_CONNECT
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 01:07:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5847B51A.6090303@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1481093287.4092.20.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Hi Johannes,
On 12/07/2016 12:48 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 00:40 -0600, Denis Kenzior wrote:
>>
>>> No, this is the part you didn't understand. Simply authenticating
>>> doesn't actually create anything like a "link" to the AP. The only
>>
>> Okay, but it is then a bit misleading that iw link reports us being
>> 'connected' during this time for example.
>
> It doesn't!
>
> # iw wlan0 auth <ssid> <bssid> open 2462
>
> -> iw event reporting
> wlan0 (phy #0): auth <localMAC> -> <bssid> status: 0: Successful
>
> # iw wlan0 link
> Not connected.
>
Yes, you're right. It is iw info that shows us 'connected'
< Request: Get Interface (0x05) len 8 [ack] 35235.316448
Interface Index: 3 (0x00000003)
> Result: New Interface (0x07) len 108 35235.316455
Interface Index: 3 (0x00000003)
Interface Name: wlp2s0
Wiphy: 0 (0x00000000)
Interface Type: 2 (0x00000002)
Wireless Device: 1 (0x0000000000000001)
Generation: 5 (0x00000005)
Wiphy Frequency: 2417 (0x00000971)
Wiphy Channel Type: 1 (0x00000001)
Channel Width: 1 (0x00000001)
Center Frequency 1: 2417 (0x00000971)
Wiphy TX Power Level: 2200 (0x00000898)
> Response: Get Interface (0x05) len 4 35235.316457
Status: Success (0)
>
>> Fair enough. I think we can live with that since we're not using
>> CMD_AUTHENTICATE unless we need to roam using FT.
>
> That seems like a very strange decision, but it's obviously up to you
> :)
>
Care to elaborate ?
Regards,
-Denis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-07 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-02 20:56 [PATCH][RFC] cfg80211: NL80211_ATTR_SOCKET_OWNER support for CMD_CONNECT Andrew Zaborowski
2016-12-05 13:51 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-05 14:55 ` Denis Kenzior
2016-12-05 14:58 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-05 15:05 ` Denis Kenzior
2016-12-05 15:14 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-05 15:32 ` Denis Kenzior
2016-12-06 7:16 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-06 21:42 ` Denis Kenzior
2016-12-07 1:40 ` Andrew Zaborowski
2016-12-07 6:19 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-07 9:49 ` Andrew Zaborowski
2016-12-07 6:15 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-07 6:40 ` Denis Kenzior
2016-12-07 6:48 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-07 7:07 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
2016-12-07 7:38 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-05 15:40 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5847B51A.6090303@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.zaborowski@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.