From: Samudrala, Sridhar <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue PATCH v3] i40e/i40evf: Update driver to support napi_complete_done changes
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 15:22:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <584B3CB2.9070806@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161208001248.13098.93773.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
On 12/7/2016 4:14 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>
> Recently napi_complete_done was updated so that it will return zero if we
> are using the queue vector for busy polling. When this is the case we
> don't need to re-enable interrupts as the busy polling will reschedule the
> NAPI instance when it is finally done polling.
This patch is causing a regression with memcached when using epoll with
busy polling.
I think we need to do more investigation before pushing or re-working
this patch.
Thanks
Sridhar
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
> ---
>
> v2: Updated code to place the IRQ enabling inside the if statment
> This made it so that we are consistent with the recent return value changes
>
> v3: Added i40evf changes as well
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 32 +++++++++++++------------
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> index e88e335c34ef..f9ef8c2676e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> @@ -2033,22 +2033,24 @@ int i40e_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> }
> }
>
> - if (vsi->back->flags & I40E_TXR_FLAGS_WB_ON_ITR)
> - q_vector->arm_wb_state = false;
> -
> - /* Work is done so exit the polling mode and re-enable the interrupt */
> - napi_complete_done(napi, work_done);
> -
> - /* If we're prematurely stopping polling to fix the interrupt
> - * affinity we want to make sure polling starts back up so we
> - * issue a call to i40e_force_wb which triggers a SW interrupt.
> + /* Work is done so exit the polling mode,
> + * if not busy polling re-enable interrupts.
> */
> - if (!clean_complete)
> - i40e_force_wb(vsi, q_vector);
> - else if (!(vsi->back->flags & I40E_FLAG_MSIX_ENABLED))
> - i40e_irq_dynamic_enable_icr0(vsi->back, false);
> - else
> - i40e_update_enable_itr(vsi, q_vector);
> + if (napi_complete_done(napi, work_done)) {
> + if (vsi->back->flags & I40E_TXR_FLAGS_WB_ON_ITR)
> + q_vector->arm_wb_state = false;
> +
> + /* If we're prematurely stopping polling to fix the interrupt
> + * affinity we want to make sure polling starts back up so we
> + * issue a call to i40e_force_wb which triggers a SW interrupt.
> + */
> + if (!clean_complete)
> + i40e_force_wb(vsi, q_vector);
> + else if (!(vsi->back->flags & I40E_FLAG_MSIX_ENABLED))
> + i40e_irq_dynamic_enable_icr0(vsi->back, false);
> + else
> + i40e_update_enable_itr(vsi, q_vector);
> + }
>
> return min(work_done, budget - 1);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c
> index 4870cb50dc33..3097a91bd4aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c
> @@ -1494,20 +1494,22 @@ int i40evf_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> }
> }
>
> - if (vsi->back->flags & I40E_TXR_FLAGS_WB_ON_ITR)
> - q_vector->arm_wb_state = false;
> -
> - /* Work is done so exit the polling mode and re-enable the interrupt */
> - napi_complete_done(napi, work_done);
> -
> - /* If we're prematurely stopping polling to fix the interrupt
> - * affinity we want to make sure polling starts back up so we
> - * issue a call to i40evf_force_wb which triggers a SW interrupt.
> + /* Work is done so exit the polling mode,
> + * if not busy polling re-enable interrupts.
> */
> - if (!clean_complete)
> - i40evf_force_wb(vsi, q_vector);
> - else
> - i40e_update_enable_itr(vsi, q_vector);
> + if (napi_complete_done(napi, work_done)) {
> + if (vsi->back->flags & I40E_TXR_FLAGS_WB_ON_ITR)
> + q_vector->arm_wb_state = false;
> +
> + /* If we're prematurely stopping polling to fix the interrupt
> + * affinity we want to make sure polling starts back up so we
> + * issue a call to i40evf_force_wb which triggers a SW interrupt.
> + */
> + if (!clean_complete)
> + i40evf_force_wb(vsi, q_vector);
> + else
> + i40e_update_enable_itr(vsi, q_vector);
> + }
>
> return min(work_done, budget - 1);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-09 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-08 0:14 [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue PATCH v3] i40e/i40evf: Update driver to support napi_complete_done changes Alexander Duyck
2016-12-09 23:22 ` Samudrala, Sridhar [this message]
2017-01-05 22:05 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-01-05 22:05 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-01-05 22:26 ` Jeff Kirsher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=584B3CB2.9070806@intel.com \
--to=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.