From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] virtio vector and misc
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:26:36 +0100
Message-ID: <5851694.Mu1jsipjhz@xps13>
References: <1456750690-3210-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>
 <20160302083225.GR14300@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <CAAyOgsYrjDzHPJCZE8aD4Cq598Vsw_VPHgY3jg=ApEb5S2Yo7g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FD72BA0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  3 Mar 2016 14:28:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id l68so131238618wml.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 05:28:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAyOgsYrjDzHPJCZE8aD4Cq598Vsw_VPHgY3jg=ApEb5S2Yo7g@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2016-03-02 14:11, Santosh Shukla:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:32:17PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> >> - 1st patch: let non-x86 arch use virtio pmd driver in non-vec
> >> - 2nd patch: enable virtio arm support
> >> - 3rd patch: update virtio for arm feature entry in release guide.
> >
> > Series looks good to me:
> >
> > Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > However, FYI, Thomas would like to see that the release note is
> > added __inside__ the patch that acutally enables it, but not in
> > another standalone patch. In another word, you should squash
> > patch 3 to patch 2.
> >
> > I'm wondering Thomas could do that for you this time while applying
> > your pathces. But, this is just a kind remind, and you should not
> > do that next time.
> >
> 
> Thanks!,
> 
> Thomas, Can you please take care?

I've squashed and reworded a bit the release note.
Applied, thanks.