From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, john.r.fastabend@intel.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
daniel@iogearbox.net
Subject: Re: [net PATCH 5/5] virtio_net: XDP support for adjust_head
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:26:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <587810C0.6070507@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170113002221-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 17-01-12 02:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 01:45:19PM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
>> Add support for XDP adjust head by allocating a 256B header region
>> that XDP programs can grow into. This is only enabled when a XDP
>> program is loaded.
>>
>> In order to ensure that we do not have to unwind queue headroom push
>> queue setup below bpf_prog_add. It reads better to do a prog ref
>> unwind vs another queue setup call.
>>
>> At the moment this code must do a full reset to ensure old buffers
>> without headroom on program add or with headroom on program removal
>> are not used incorrectly in the datapath. Ideally we would only
>> have to disable/enable the RX queues being updated but there is no
>> API to do this at the moment in virtio so use the big hammer. In
>> practice it is likely not that big of a problem as this will only
>> happen when XDP is enabled/disabled changing programs does not
>> require the reset. There is some risk that the driver may either
>> have an allocation failure or for some reason fail to correctly
>> negotiate with the underlying backend in this case the driver will
>> be left uninitialized. I have not seen this ever happen on my test
>> systems and for what its worth this same failure case can occur
>> from probe and other contexts in virtio framework.
>
> Could you explain about this a bit more?
> Thanks!
>
Sure. There are two existing paths and this patch adds a third one
where the driver basically goes through this reset path. First one
is on probe the other one is on the freeze/restore path.
The virtnet_freeze() path eventually free's the memory for rq/sq
(receive queues and send queues).
virtnet_freeze()
...
remove_vq_common()
...
virtnet_dev_vqs()
vdev->config->del_vqs()
virtnet_free_queues <- this does a kfree
On virtnet_restore() path we then have to reallocate and reneg with
backend.
virtnet_retore()
...
init_vqs()
...
virtnet_alloc_queues() <- alloc sq/rq
virtnet_find_vqs()
(allocates callbacks/names/vqs)
So the above allocs could fail and leave the device in a FAILED
state. This can happen today on probe or freeze/restore paths and
after this patch possibly on XDP load. Although as noted I have not
seen it happen in any of the above cases.
Second failure mode could happen if virtio_finalize_features() fails.
This seems unlikely because in order to probe successfully we had to
finalize the features successfully earlier. But it could I guess happen
based on return codes. Again never seen this actually happen. This is
called in probe case, freeze/restore case, and XDP now as well.
Does that help? Also I need to send a v2 to fix a spelling mistake and
to convert a 'unsigned' to 'unsigned int' per checkpatch warning. Always
better to run checkpatch before submitting vs after.
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-12 21:43 [net PATCH 0/5] virtio_net XDP fixes and ajust_header xupport John Fastabend
2017-01-12 21:43 ` [net PATCH 1/5] virtio_net: use dev_kfree_skb for small buffer XDP receive John Fastabend
2017-01-12 21:44 ` [net PATCH 2/5] net: virtio: wrap rtnl_lock in test for calling with lock already held John Fastabend
2017-01-12 21:44 ` [net PATCH 3/5] virtio_net: factor out xdp handler for readability John Fastabend
2017-01-12 21:44 ` [net PATCH 4/5] virtio_net: remove duplicate queue pair binding in XDP John Fastabend
2017-01-12 21:45 ` [net PATCH 5/5] virtio_net: XDP support for adjust_head John Fastabend
2017-01-12 22:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-12 23:26 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2017-01-13 17:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-13 19:53 ` John Fastabend
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=587810C0.6070507@gmail.com \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.