Re: [Xenomai] Xenomai-3 booting problems

[Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <leo@alaxarxa.net>]

El Dijous, 22 de gener de 2015, a les 11:24:55, Gilles Chanteperdrix va 
escriure:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:17:41AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > El Dijous, 22 de gener de 2015, a les 10:56:35, Gilles Chanteperdrix va
> > 
> > escriure:
> > > > > What about the ARCH problem with make-kpkg, is it solved ?
> > > > 
> > > > As I said yesterday [1], there's a question of the ARCH var, used in
> > > > the
> > > > prepare-kernel script.
> > > 
> > > No, yesterday you said that the prepare-kernel script probably was
> > > not the problem
> > 
> > I said a lot of things yesterday :-D and yes, I thought that probably it
> > wasn't.
> > 
> > > because you can compile the prepared kernel
> > > manually. Or did I misunderstand?
> > 
> > Yes, it's true. I can compile the kernel manually but I can create the
> > debian package if I modify the result obtained by the prepare-kernel
> > script.> 
> > > > Any idea to solve this?
> > > 
> > > As I already said, you have to execute what make-kpkg does, by hand,
> > > step by step, to understand which step goes wrong.
> > :
> > :-D
> > 
> > It's no easy, at least by my, check why make-kpkg does. But, I think that
> > there's a collision with that var (ARCH). I think that debian use that var
> > for some internal proposes and it's different (in the x86 platform x86 vs
> > x86_64), or has some troubles.
> > 
> > Really I don't know if it's a mix of prepare-kernel problem, make-kpkg
> > problem or user problem.
> 
> As you said, if you can compile the prepared kernel manually, it is
> not a prepare-kernel problem.
> 
> > If you see clearly that it's make-kpkg problem, I concentrate my efforts
> > on
> > that.
> 
> Well, the fact that the compilation error happens when trying to
> compile a Xenomai file would seem to indicate that prepare-kernel.sh
> has put the wrong link into init/Kconfig.
> 
> You pass --arch=x86 to prepare-kernel.sh, right, not --arch=x86_64 ?

yes, I have tried both, but I put --arch=x86 or the default option as I said 
it in my email from yesterday ( :-P)

Seriously, now I have compiled manually the kernel (make bzImage modules) and 
no error, but after the compilation on interested directory have appeared in 
arch dir: 
ls -l arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage 
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 gen 22 10:32 arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage -> 
../../x86/boot/bzImage

Maybe it's something related to debian.

Leopold
-- 
--
Linux User 152692     GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/attachments/20150122/b6ee5ece/attachment.sig>