From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cU645-0005Ql-6i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 01:19:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cU640-0006JI-5u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 01:19:17 -0500 Received: from [59.151.112.132] (port=64285 helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cU63z-0006IF-P6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 01:19:12 -0500 References: <1483175588-17006-1-git-send-email-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20170118144321.38c984bf@t450s.home> From: Cao jin Message-ID: <58805BBF.3070509@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 14:25:03 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170118144321.38c984bf@t450s.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v11 0/4] vfio-pci: pass non-fatal error to guest List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex Williamson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com On 01/19/2017 05:43 AM, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 17:13:04 +0800 > How can you know if he other function was affected if you don't even > have a cable connected? Will try ask for another cable for the other function. > How is testing on something that doesn't seem > to work correctly already valid? Thanks, Not sure I understand you right. Even if I find those abnormal phenomenon in test, I finally got the very exact result I expected in each scenario, does it enough to prove this new functionality works? and especially these abnormal phenomenon exists even without this patchset -- Sincerely, Cao jin