From: "Aníbal Limón" <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
To: Jair Gonzalez <jair.de.jesus.gonzalez.plascencia@linux.intel.com>,
bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [[selftest][PATCH] 1/2] bitbake: tests: create unit tests for event module
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 11:07:54 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <588789EA.3090102@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <170ecdc0502ef8509b1d513a7522606ed870278a.1485212879.git.jair.de.jesus.gonzalez.plascencia@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 16817 bytes --]
Hi Jair,
At first glance your tests are good, there are some comments below,
Cheers,
alimon
On 01/23/2017 05:25 PM, Jair Gonzalez wrote:
> This change adds a new unit test module (bb.tests.event)
> for bitbake event.
> It includes the following items:
>
> - Client and server stubs setup
> - Testing the module's main functions including:
> - get_class_handlers
> - set_class_handlers
> - clean_class_handlers
> - enable_threadlock
> - disable_threadlock
> - get_handlers
> - set_handlers
> - execute_handler
> - fire_class_handlers
> - print_ui_queue
> - fire_ui_handlers
> - fire
> - fire_from_worker
> - register
> - remove
> - register_UIHhandler
> - unregister_UIHhandler
> - Testing event handling using:
> - class Event(object)
> - class OperationStarted(Event)
> - class OperationCompleted(Event)
> - class OperationProgress(Event)
> - class ConfigParsed(Event)
>
> [YOCTO #10368]
>
> Signed-off-by: Jair Gonzalez <jair.de.jesus.gonzalez.plascencia@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> bitbake/lib/bb/tests/event.py | 324 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 324 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 bitbake/lib/bb/tests/event.py
>
> diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/event.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/event.py
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..58846ee
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/event.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,324 @@
> +# ex:ts=4:sw=4:sts=4:et
> +# -*- tab-width: 4; c-basic-offset: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil -*-
> +#
> +# BitBake Tests for the Event implementation (event.py)
> +#
> +# Copyright (C) 2017 Intel
Here is missing the Corporation.
Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
> +# with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
> +# 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
> +#
> +
> +import unittest
> +import bb
> +import logging
> +import bb.compat
> +import bb.event
> +import importlib
> +import threading
> +import time
> +from unittest.mock import Mock
> +
> +
> +class EventQueueStub():
> + """ Class used as specification for UI event handler queue stub objects """
> + def __init__(self):
> + return
> +
> + def send(self, event):
> + return
> +
> +
> +class PickleEventQueueStub():
> + """ Class used as specification for UI event handler queue stub objects
> + with sendpickle method """
> + def __init__(self):
> + return
> +
> + def sendpickle(self, pickled_event):
> + return
> +
> +
> +class UIClientStub():
> + """ Class used as specification for UI event handler stub objects """
> + def __init__(self):
> + self.event = None
> +
> +
> +class EventHandlingTest(unittest.TestCase):
> + """ Event handling test class """
> + _threadlock_test_calls = []
> +
> + def setUp(self):
> + self._test_process = Mock()
> + ui_client1 = UIClientStub()
> + ui_client2 = UIClientStub()
> + self._test_ui1 = Mock(wraps=ui_client1)
> + self._test_ui2 = Mock(wraps=ui_client2)
> + importlib.reload(bb.event)
> +
> + def _create_test_handlers(self):
> + """ Method used to create a test handler ordered dictionary """
> + test_handlers = bb.compat.OrderedDict()
> + test_handlers["handler1"] = self._test_process.handler1
> + test_handlers["handler2"] = self._test_process.handler2
> + return test_handlers
> +
> + def test_class_handlers(self):
> + """ Test set_class_handlers and get_class_handlers methods """
> + test_handlers = self._create_test_handlers()
> + bb.event.set_class_handlers(test_handlers)
> + self.assertEqual(test_handlers,
> + bb.event.get_class_handlers())
Since the bb.event set_class_handlers and clean_handlers are simple, i
don't know if there needs of a test case. The same in the related code
below.
> +
> + def test_handlers(self):
> + """ Test set_handlers and get_handlers """
> + test_handlers = self._create_test_handlers()
> + bb.event.set_handlers(test_handlers)
> + self.assertEqual(test_handlers,
> + bb.event.get_handlers())
> +
> + def test_clean_class_handlers(self):
> + """ Test clean_class_handlers method """
> + cleanDict = bb.compat.OrderedDict()
> + self.assertEqual(cleanDict,
> + bb.event.clean_class_handlers())
> +
> + def test_register(self):
> + """ Test register method for class handlers """
> + result = bb.event.register("handler", self._test_process.handler)
> + self.assertEqual(result, bb.event.Registered)
> + handlers_dict = bb.event.get_class_handlers()
> + self.assertIn("handler", handlers_dict)
> +
> + def test_already_registered(self):
> + """ Test detection of an already registed class handler """
> + bb.event.register("handler", self._test_process.handler)
> + handlers_dict = bb.event.get_class_handlers()
> + self.assertIn("handler", handlers_dict)
> + result = bb.event.register("handler", self._test_process.handler)
> + self.assertEqual(result, bb.event.AlreadyRegistered)
> +
> + def test_register_from_string(self):
> + """ Test register method receiving code in string """
> + result = bb.event.register("string_handler", " return True")
> + self.assertEqual(result, bb.event.Registered)
> + handlers_dict = bb.event.get_class_handlers()
> + self.assertIn("string_handler", handlers_dict)
> +
> + def test_register_with_mask(self):
> + """ Test register method with event masking """
> + mask = ["bb.event.OperationStarted",
> + "bb.event.OperationCompleted"]
> + result = bb.event.register("event_handler",
> + self._test_process.event_handler,
> + mask)
> + self.assertEqual(result, bb.event.Registered)
> + handlers_dict = bb.event.get_class_handlers()
> + self.assertIn("event_handler", handlers_dict)
> +
> + def test_remove(self):
> + """ Test remove method for class handlers """
> + test_handlers = self._create_test_handlers()
> + bb.event.set_class_handlers(test_handlers)
> + count = len(test_handlers)
> + bb.event.remove("handler1", None)
> + self.assertEqual(len(test_handlers), count - 1)
> + with self.assertRaises(KeyError):
> + bb.event.remove("handler1", None)
> +
> + def test_execute_handler(self):
> + """ Test execute_handler method for class handlers """
> + mask = ["bb.event.OperationProgress"]
> + result = bb.event.register("event_handler",
> + self._test_process.event_handler,
> + mask)
> + self.assertEqual(result, bb.event.Registered)
> + event = bb.event.OperationProgress(current=10, total=100)
> + bb.event.execute_handler("event_handler",
> + self._test_process.event_handler,
> + event,
> + None)
> + self._test_process.event_handler.assert_called_once_with(event)
> +
> + def test_fire_class_handlers(self):
> + """ Test fire_class_handlers method """
> + mask = ["bb.event.OperationStarted"]
> + result = bb.event.register("event_handler1",
> + self._test_process.event_handler1,
> + mask)
> + self.assertEqual(result, bb.event.Registered)
> + result = bb.event.register("event_handler2",
> + self._test_process.event_handler2,
> + "*")
> + event1 = bb.event.OperationStarted()
> + event2 = bb.event.OperationCompleted(total=123)
> + bb.event.fire_class_handlers(event1, None)
> + bb.event.fire_class_handlers(event2, None)
> + bb.event.fire_class_handlers(event2, None)
> + self.assertEqual(self._test_process.event_handler1.call_count, 1)
> + self.assertEqual(self._test_process.event_handler2.call_count, 3)
You count for number of events arrived, will be good if you can test
about what type of event arrived. The same in the related code below.
> +
> + def test_change_handler_event_mapping(self):
> + """ Test changing the event mapping for class handlers """
> + # register handler for all events
> + result = bb.event.register("event_handler1",
> + self._test_process.event_handler1,
> + "*")
> + self.assertEqual(result, bb.event.Registered)
> + event1 = bb.event.OperationStarted()
> + event2 = bb.event.OperationCompleted(total=123)
> + bb.event.fire_class_handlers(event1, None)
> + bb.event.fire_class_handlers(event2, None)
> + self.assertEqual(self._test_process.event_handler1.call_count, 2)
> +
> + # unregister handler and register it only for OperationStarted
> + result = bb.event.remove("event_handler1",
> + self._test_process.event_handler1)
> + mask = ["bb.event.OperationStarted"]
> + result = bb.event.register("event_handler1",
> + self._test_process.event_handler1,
> + mask)
> + self.assertEqual(result, bb.event.Registered)
> + bb.event.fire_class_handlers(event1, None)
> + bb.event.fire_class_handlers(event2, None)
> + self.assertEqual(self._test_process.event_handler1.call_count, 3)
> +
> + def test_register_UIHhandler(self):
> + """ Test register_UIHhandler method """
> + result = bb.event.register_UIHhandler(self._test_ui1, mainui=True)
> + self.assertEqual(result, 1)
> +
> + def test_UIHhandler_already_registered(self):
> + """ Test registering an UIHhandler already existing """
> + result = bb.event.register_UIHhandler(self._test_ui1, mainui=True)
> + self.assertEqual(result, 1)
> + result = bb.event.register_UIHhandler(self._test_ui1, mainui=True)
> + self.assertEqual(result, 2)
> +
> + def test_unregister_UIHhandler(self):
> + """ Test unregister_UIHhandler method """
> + result = bb.event.register_UIHhandler(self._test_ui1, mainui=True)
> + self.assertEqual(result, 1)
> + result = bb.event.unregister_UIHhandler(1)
> + self.assertIs(result, None)
> +
> + def test_fire_ui_handlers(self):
> + """ Test fire_ui_handlers method """
> + self._test_ui1.event = Mock(spec_set=EventQueueStub)
> + result = bb.event.register_UIHhandler(self._test_ui1, mainui=True)
> + self.assertEqual(result, 1)
> + self._test_ui2.event = Mock(spec_set=PickleEventQueueStub)
> + result = bb.event.register_UIHhandler(self._test_ui2, mainui=True)
> + self.assertEqual(result, 2)
> + bb.event.fire_ui_handlers(bb.event.OperationStarted(), None)
> + self.assertEqual(self._test_ui1.event.send.call_count, 1)
> + self.assertEqual(self._test_ui2.event.sendpickle.call_count, 1)
> +
> + def test_fire(self):
> + """ Test fire method used to trigger class and ui event handlers """
> + mask = ["bb.event.ConfigParsed"]
> + result = bb.event.register("event_handler1",
> + self._test_process.event_handler1,
> + mask)
> +
> + self._test_ui1.event = Mock(spec_set=EventQueueStub)
> + result = bb.event.register_UIHhandler(self._test_ui1, mainui=True)
> + self.assertEqual(result, 1)
> +
> + event1 = bb.event.ConfigParsed()
> + bb.event.fire(event1, None)
> + self.assertEqual(self._test_process.event_handler1.call_count, 1)
> + self.assertEqual(self._test_ui1.event.send.call_count, 1)
> +
> + def test_fire_from_worker(self):
> + """ Test fire_from_worker method """
> + self._test_ui1.event = Mock(spec_set=EventQueueStub)
> + result = bb.event.register_UIHhandler(self._test_ui1, mainui=True)
> + self.assertEqual(result, 1)
> + bb.event.fire_from_worker(bb.event.ConfigParsed(), None)
> + self.assertEqual(self._test_ui1.event.send.call_count, 1)
> +
> + def test_print_ui_queue(self):
> + """ Test print_ui_queue method """
> + event1 = bb.event.OperationStarted()
> + event2 = bb.event.OperationCompleted(total=123)
> + bb.event.fire(event1, None)
> + bb.event.fire(event2, None)
> + logger = logging.getLogger("BitBake")
> + logger.addHandler(bb.event.LogHandler())
> + logger.info("Test info LogRecord")
> + logger.warning("Test warning LogRecord")
> + with self.assertLogs("BitBake", level="INFO") as cm:
> + bb.event.print_ui_queue()
> + self.assertEqual(cm.output,
> + ["INFO:BitBake:Test info LogRecord",
> + "WARNING:BitBake:Test warning LogRecord"])
> +
> + def _set_threadlock_test_mockups(self):
> + """ Create test mockups used in enable and disable threadlock
> + tests """
> + def ui1_event_send(event):
> + self._threadlock_test_calls.append(1)
> + time.sleep(0.2)
> +
> + def ui2_event_send(event):
> + self._threadlock_test_calls.append(2)
> + time.sleep(0.2)
> +
> + self._threadlock_test_calls = []
> + self._test_ui1.event = EventQueueStub()
> + self._test_ui1.event.send = ui1_event_send
> + result = bb.event.register_UIHhandler(self._test_ui1, mainui=True)
> + self.assertEqual(result, 1)
> + self._test_ui2.event = EventQueueStub()
> + self._test_ui2.event.send = ui2_event_send
> + result = bb.event.register_UIHhandler(self._test_ui2, mainui=True)
> + self.assertEqual(result, 2)
> +
> + def _set_and_run_threadlock_test_workers(self):
> + """ Create and run workers used in enable and disable threadlock
> + tests """
> + worker1 = threading.Thread(target=self._thread_lock_test_worker)
> + worker2 = threading.Thread(target=self._thread_lock_test_worker)
> + worker1.start()
> + time.sleep(0.01)
> + worker2.start()
> + time.sleep(0.2)
> + worker1.join()
> + worker2.join()
> +
> + def _thread_lock_test_worker(self):
> + """ Worker used to create race conditions for enable and disable
> + threadlocks tests """
> + bb.event.fire(bb.event.ConfigParsed(), None)
> + time.sleep(0.02)
> + bb.event.fire(bb.event.OperationStarted(), None)
> +
> + def test_enable_threadlock(self):
> + """ Test enable_threadlock method """
> + self._set_threadlock_test_mockups()
> + bb.event.enable_threadlock()
> + self._set_and_run_threadlock_test_workers()
> + # Calls to UI Handlers should be in order
> + self.assertEqual(self._threadlock_test_calls,
> + [1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2])
This kind of test of inputs given by certain threads don't guarantee the
order it depends on Python thread scheduler so i suggest to test for a
number of thread1 of inputs and thread2 inputs. Same below.
> +
> + def test_disable_threadlock(self):
> + """ Test disable_threadlock method """
> + self._set_threadlock_test_mockups()
> + bb.event.disable_threadlock()
> + self._set_and_run_threadlock_test_workers()
> + # Calls to UI Handlers should be interwined together
> + self.assertEqual(self._threadlock_test_calls,
> + [1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2])
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-24 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-23 23:25 [[selftest][PATCH] 0/2] QA: create unit tests for event module Jair Gonzalez
2017-01-23 23:25 ` [[selftest][PATCH] 1/2] bitbake: tests: " Jair Gonzalez
2017-01-24 17:07 ` Aníbal Limón [this message]
2017-01-25 2:35 ` Jair Gonzalez
2017-01-25 21:52 ` Aníbal Limón
2017-01-23 23:25 ` [[selftest][PATCH] 2/2] bitbake: selftest: add bb.tests.event to bitbake-selftest Jair Gonzalez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=588789EA.3090102@linux.intel.com \
--to=anibal.limon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=jair.de.jesus.gonzalez.plascencia@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.