All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM ATTEND] userfaultfd
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:10:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <588A1F92.6010405@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170126130831.GA28055@rapoport-lnx>

On 01/26/2017 04:08 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm working on integration of userfaultfd into CRIU. Currently we can
> perform lazy restore and post-copy migration with the help of
> userfaultfd, but there are some limitations because of incomplete
> in-kernel support for non-cooperative mode of userfaultfd.
> 
> I'd like to particpate in userfaultfd-WP discussion suggested by
> Andrea Acangeli [1].

I'd like to support Mike's "self-nomination".

-- Pavel

> Besides, I would like to broaden userfaultfd discussion so it will
> also cover the following topics:
> 
> * Non-cooperative userfaultfd APIs for checkpoint/restore
> 
> Checkpoint/restore of an application that uses userfaultfd will
> require additions to the userfaultfd API. The new APIs are needed to
> allow saving parts of in-kernel state of userfaultfd during checkpoint
> and then recreating this state during restore.
> 
> * Userfaultfd and COW-sharing.
> 
> If we have two tasks that fork()-ed from each other and we try to
> lazily restore a page that is still COW-ed between them, the uffd API
> doesn't give us anything to do it. So we effectively break COW on lazy
> restore.
> 
> * Userfaultfd "nesting" [2]
> 
> CRIU uses soft-dirty to track memory changes. We would like to switch
> to userfaultfd-WP once it gets merged. If the process for which we are
> tracking memory changes uses userfaultfd, we would need some notion of
> uffd "nesting", so that the same memory region could be monitored by
> different userfault file descriptors. Even more interesting case is
> tracking memory changes of two different processes: one process that
> has memory regions monitored by uffd and another one that owns the
> non-cooperative userfault file descriptor to monitor the first
> process.
> The userfaultfd "nesting" is also required for lazy restore scenario so
> that CRIU will be able to use userfaultfd for memory ranges that the
> restored application is already managing with userfaultfd.
> 
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg119866.html
> [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg112500.html
> 
> .
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2017-01-26 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-26 13:08 [LSF/MM ATTEND] userfaultfd Mike Rapoport
2017-01-26 16:10 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=588A1F92.6010405@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=xemul@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.