From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Fastabend Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:20:05 -0800 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 0/4] i40e: Support for XDP In-Reply-To: References: <20161217134000.31640-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5893B095.6030104@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: On 17-02-01 01:32 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Bj?rn T?pel wrote: >> 2017-01-31 22:37 GMT+01:00 Alexander Duyck : >>> We probably need to respin this and do a v5 of the XDP code so that we >>> can reserve some headroom at the start of the frames. I have patches >>> I already working on to enable build_skb like I have done for igb and >>> ixgbe. I can probably take on respinning this and getting it applied >>> to our out-of-tree driver. >> >> Respinning or an additional patch for the xdp_adjust_head() >> support? Maybe it's better to respin it, so we get proper >> xdp_adjust_head() support, prior upstreaming. > > It makes the upstreaming process easier for us since we normally work > out of tree and then upstream patches after testing in the case of > i40e. > Any hints on when we can expect a v5 to show up? I have a few folks pulling these outside Intel that are waiting to get these patches. >> If headroom support for XDP aligns nicely into your build_skb >> patches for i40e, feel free to do that! If not, let me know, and >> I'll start working on it. > > Yeah, I'll be working on providing headroom in order to support > build_skb anyway so I can just combine the efforts. Then it makes the > upstreaming effort easier as well as we will have the headroom added > before we actually start work on XDP. > > Thanks. > > - Alex >