From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 0/4] i40e: Support for XDP
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 14:02:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5898F271.1000009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UeLL4xyWVZH3Fvrsg7SpHZ-X-PGYz-NOP7NzgiagOGzow@mail.gmail.com>
On 17-02-02 02:57 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> It would likely be several weeks. I am still trying to finish up the
> out-of-tree build_skb changes for i40e. Once I have that then I can
> start working on the XDP bits.
>
> My guess would be that these would probably end up in the 4.12 kernel
> when everything is said and done.
OK, iirc though ixgbe already has these changes and we can add XDP support
without any delays there?
I have a handful of folks wanting to test/use this with adjust_header support
so for the time being I'm going to push a fork to my github branch for folks
to pull. But the sooner the better for mainline support.
Thanks,
John
>
> - Alex
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:20 PM, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 17-02-01 01:32 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Bj?rn T?pel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 2017-01-31 22:37 GMT+01:00 Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>:
>>>>> We probably need to respin this and do a v5 of the XDP code so that we
>>>>> can reserve some headroom at the start of the frames. I have patches
>>>>> I already working on to enable build_skb like I have done for igb and
>>>>> ixgbe. I can probably take on respinning this and getting it applied
>>>>> to our out-of-tree driver.
>>>>
>>>> Respinning or an additional patch for the xdp_adjust_head()
>>>> support? Maybe it's better to respin it, so we get proper
>>>> xdp_adjust_head() support, prior upstreaming.
>>>
>>> It makes the upstreaming process easier for us since we normally work
>>> out of tree and then upstream patches after testing in the case of
>>> i40e.
>>>
>>
>> Any hints on when we can expect a v5 to show up? I have a few folks
>> pulling these outside Intel that are waiting to get these patches.
>>
>>>> If headroom support for XDP aligns nicely into your build_skb
>>>> patches for i40e, feel free to do that! If not, let me know, and
>>>> I'll start working on it.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I'll be working on providing headroom in order to support
>>> build_skb anyway so I can just combine the efforts. Then it makes the
>>> upstreaming effort easier as well as we will have the headroom added
>>> before we actually start work on XDP.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> - Alex
>>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-06 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-17 13:39 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 0/4] i40e: Support for XDP =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-17 13:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 1/4] i40e: Sync DMA region prior skbuff allocation =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-23 17:35 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-12-17 13:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 2/4] i40e: Initial support for XDP =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-23 17:35 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-12-17 13:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 3/4] i40e: Add XDP_TX support =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-23 17:36 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-12-17 13:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 4/4] i40e: Validate xdp_adjust_head support =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-23 17:36 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2017-01-31 21:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 0/4] i40e: Support for XDP Alexander Duyck
2017-01-31 22:30 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2017-02-01 21:32 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-02-02 11:34 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2017-02-02 22:20 ` John Fastabend
2017-02-02 22:57 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-02-06 22:02 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2017-02-06 23:09 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5898F271.1000009@gmail.com \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.