From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang-zgCPCz31fAiwd6j6Zg/5ug@public.gmane.org>
Subject: bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:00:30 +0800
Message-ID: <58A2C72E.6090200@easystack.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <ceph-users-bounces-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ceph.com/options.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>,
	<mailto:ceph-users-request-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/>
List-Post: <mailto:ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ceph-users-request-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>,
	<mailto:ceph-users-request-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ceph-users-bounces-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org
Sender: "ceph-users" <ceph-users-bounces-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org>
To: Sage Weil <notifications-9UaJU3cA/F/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org
List-Id: ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org

Hi Sage and all,
     We are going to use SSDs for cache in ceph. But I am not sure which 
one is the best solution, bcache? flashcache? or cache tier?

I found there are some CAUTION in ceph.com about cache tiering. Is cache 
tiering is already production ready? especially for rbd.

thanx in advance.
Yang