All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: L A Walsh <lvm@tlinx.org>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] pvmove speed
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:44:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58A64774.10004@tlinx.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269016789.1015.1487269373950.JavaMail.zimbra@karlsbakk.net>

Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>> I'm doing pvmove of some rather large volumes from a Dell Equallogic system to
>> Dell Compellent. Both are connected on iSCSI ....
----
    I've never had very great speeds over a network.  I've gotten the 
impression
that iSCSI is slower than some other network protocols.

    Locally (RAID=>RAID) I got about 400-500MB/s, but the best I've 
gotten, recently, over a 10Gb network card has been about 200MB/s.  
Oddly, when I first got the cards, I was getting up to 400-600MB/s, but 
after MS started pushing
Win10 and "updates" to Win7 (my communication has been between 
Win7SP1<->linux server), my speed dropped to barely over 100MB/s which 
is about what I got with
a 1Gb card.  I wasn't able to get any better speeds using *windows* 
single-threaded SMB proto even using 2x10Gb (have a dedicated link tween
workstation and server) -- but I did notice the cpu maxing out on either the
windows or the Samba side depending on packet size and who was doing the 
sending.

    50MB sounds awfully slow, but not out of the ballpark -- I had 
benched a few
NAS solutions @ home, but could rarely get about 10MB/s (usually 
slower), so gave up on those and went w/a linux server -- but still alot 
slower than I'd
like (100-200MB/s sustained, but those figures may change w/the next MS 
"update").  But gave up on commercial, out-of-the-box solutions, and the 
4x1Gb
connect you have may be costing you more cpu than its worth... Problem I 
noted
on 2x10G was too many duplicate packets -- so running 1x10Gb now but 
still maxing out around 200MB/s over an unencrypted SMB/CIFS session.

    I'm not sure it could be an LVM problem given its local speed for 
pvmoves --
do you have some measurement of faster file I/O throughput using iSCSI 
over your
connections?

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-17  1:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-11  8:59 [linux-lvm] pvmove speed Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2017-02-16 18:22 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2017-02-17  0:44   ` L A Walsh [this message]
2017-02-17  1:24     ` pattonme
2017-02-17 15:12     ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2017-02-17 17:01       ` John Stoffel
2017-02-17 17:33         ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2017-02-17 23:00       ` L A Walsh
2017-02-18  8:12         ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2017-02-18 16:55           ` Mark Mielke
2017-02-20  9:59             ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-03-31 16:27               ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58A64774.10004@tlinx.org \
    --to=lvm@tlinx.org \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.