All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:02:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58AAB0AC.9080601@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170220122227.54f04c2a@canb.auug.org.au>

On 02/20/2017 02:22 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
>
>    kernel/extable.c
>
> between commit:
>
>    74451e66d516 ("bpf: make jited programs visible in traces")
>
> from the net-next tree and commit:
>
>    5b485629ba0d ("kprobes, extable: Identify kprobes trampolines as kernel text area")
>
> from the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Looks good to me, thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-20  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-20  1:22 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-20  9:02 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-07-22  1:42 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-29 23:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-04  6:28 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-07  2:49 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-07  6:06 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-05-28  6:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-02-28  4:43 Stephen Rothwell
2025-02-28 21:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-26  5:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-15  2:13 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-10  1:12 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-18  2:31 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-18  5:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-02-15  2:20 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-01  7:15 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-01  8:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-01  8:27   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-01  8:55     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-01  9:04       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-01 10:57       ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-01 16:27       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-11-05  2:12         ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-01  7:10 Stephen Rothwell
2017-10-30 20:55 Mark Brown
2017-11-13  6:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-31  3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-05  0:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-12  2:30 Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-01  3:46 Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-17  3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-07  7:11 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-07  7:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-07  7:32 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-04-07 16:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-04-07  7:04 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-07  7:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-07 16:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-04-07  7:00 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-07  7:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-07  7:30 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-07-25  4:38 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-25  4:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-05  4:29 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-05  4:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-13  3:18 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-13  3:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-13  3:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-13  3:20   ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-14  3:02   ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-14  3:02     ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-14  4:51     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-14  5:19       ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-14  5:19       ` David Miller
2014-01-14  5:44         ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-14  5:48           ` David Miller
2014-01-14  6:10             ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-08  4:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-08  4:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-11  4:03 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-11  4:03 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58AAB0AC.9080601@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.