From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wols Lists Subject: Re: GRUB warning after replacing disk drive in RAID1 Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:15:04 +0000 Message-ID: <58B81AD8.9030306@youngman.org.uk> References: <002f01d29152$737b4550$5a71cff0$@wnsdev.com> <008001d29205$e4f503c0$aedf0b40$@wnsdev.com> <59c85e04-2f6a-1c81-ccba-fa8aac1c50ee@thelounge.net> <009601d29218$9fd3e460$df7bad20$@wnsdev.com> <5136f32b-a0bb-dc16-cae9-59946ea21622@turmel.org> <99581e49-2a6b-e8ce-fdb5-44d923b067eb@turmel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <99581e49-2a6b-e8ce-fdb5-44d923b067eb@turmel.org> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Phil Turmel , Reindl Harald , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 02/03/17 02:42, Phil Turmel wrote: > On 03/01/2017 05:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 01.03.2017 um 19:29 schrieb Phil Turmel: >>> Hi Peter, Reindl, >>> >>> { Convention on kernel.org is to reply-to-all, trim unneeded quoted >>> material, and bottom post or interleave. Please do so. } >> >> why should someone reply to the list and everyboy else subscribed to the >> list to trigger multiple copies? > > Because kernel.org doesn't require subscriptions to post, and does > expect participants to include non-subscribers. Since one can't > normally tell who is subscribed and who is not, reply-to-all is the rule > here. Other lists have other policies. > fwiw, some mailing list software detects this, and if you're cc'd on a mail the list won't send you another copy. And some client software also de-dupes for you without asking. I run TB so I need an add-on - especially as something in my mail setup duplicates emails madly every now and then ... :-) Cheers, Wol