From: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: "zhiyuan.lv@intel.com" <zhiyuan.lv@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] x86/ioreq server: Release the p2m lock after mmio is handled.
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 23:22:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58C021C6.80308@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76ac974773124daaabf32b7467cb0196@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net>
On 3/8/2017 10:06 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Yu
>> Zhang
>> Sent: 08 March 2017 13:32
>> To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>> Cc: zhiyuan.lv@intel.com
>> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 1/5] x86/ioreq server: Release the p2m lock
>> after mmio is handled.
>>
>> Routine hvmemul_do_io() may need to peek the p2m type of a gfn to
>> select the ioreq server. For example, operations on gfns with
>> p2m_ioreq_server type will be delivered to a corresponding ioreq
>> server, and this requires that the p2m type not be switched back
>> to p2m_ram_rw during the emulation process. To avoid this race
>> condition, we delay the release of p2m lock in
>> hvm_hap_nested_page_fault()
>> until mmio is handled.
>>
>> Note: previously in hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(), put_gfn() was moved
>> before the handling of mmio, due to a deadlock risk between the p2m
>> lock and the event lock(in commit 77b8dfe). Later, a per-event channel
>> lock was introduced in commit de6acb7, to send events. So we do not
>> need to worry about the deadlock issue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>> ---
>> Cc: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
>> Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> Your cc-s seem to have been dropped by your mailer (or at least I can't see them in the mail header). You may want to send these again so that relevant folks actually get cc-ed.
Thanks for your remind. Let me try again. This is strange because I had
commented out supress-cc in my git config.
Please ignore this thread, and sorry for the inconvenience. :-)
Yu
> Paul
>
>> ---
>> xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 8 ++------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> index ccfae4f..a9db7f7 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> @@ -1870,18 +1870,14 @@ int hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(paddr_t gpa,
>> unsigned long gla,
>> (npfec.write_access &&
>> (p2m_is_discard_write(p2mt) || (p2mt == p2m_ioreq_server))) )
>> {
>> - __put_gfn(p2m, gfn);
>> - if ( ap2m_active )
>> - __put_gfn(hostp2m, gfn);
>> -
>> rc = 0;
>> if ( unlikely(is_pvh_domain(currd)) )
>> - goto out;
>> + goto out_put_gfn;
>>
>> if ( !handle_mmio_with_translation(gla, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT, npfec) )
>> hvm_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_gp_fault, 0);
>> rc = 1;
>> - goto out;
>> + goto out_put_gfn;
>> }
>>
>> /* Check if the page has been paged out */
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>> https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-08 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-08 13:32 [PATCH v7 0/5] x86/ioreq server: Introduce HVMMEM_ioreq_server mem type Yu Zhang
2017-03-08 13:32 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] x86/ioreq server: Release the p2m lock after mmio is handled Yu Zhang
2017-03-08 14:06 ` Paul Durrant
2017-03-08 15:22 ` Yu Zhang [this message]
2017-03-08 13:32 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] x86/ioreq server: Add DMOP to map guest ram with p2m_ioreq_server to an ioreq server Yu Zhang
2017-03-08 13:32 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] x86/ioreq server: Handle read-modify-write cases for p2m_ioreq_server pages Yu Zhang
2017-03-08 13:32 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] ix86/ioreq server: Asynchronously reset outstanding p2m_ioreq_server entries Yu Zhang
2017-03-08 13:32 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] x86/ioreq server: Synchronously reset outstanding p2m_ioreq_server entries when an ioreq server unmaps Yu Zhang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-08 15:33 [PATCH v7 0/5] x86/ioreq server: Introduce HVMMEM_ioreq_server mem type Yu Zhang
2017-03-08 15:33 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] x86/ioreq server: Release the p2m lock after mmio is handled Yu Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58C021C6.80308@linux.intel.com \
--to=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=zhiyuan.lv@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.