From: Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@huawei.com>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <jolsa@redhat.com>, <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
<eranian@google.com>, <mingo@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/urgent] perf/core: Fix the perf_cpu_time_max_percent check
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:52:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58C74CEA.4030402@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703131432371.12942@macbook-air>
On 2017/3/14 2:35, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 04:10:37PM +0800, Tan Xiaojun wrote:
>>
>>> 2)If it is, where we will fix it more appropriate, perf_fuzzer(not set
>>> 0 or 100) or kernel(limit 1 to 99), or maybe it is the bug of
>>> hardware(too many hardware interruptions)?
>>
>> I think the best would be if the fuzzer would not set 0,100, those are
>> clearly 'unsafe' settings and you pretty much get to keep the pieces.
>>
>> I would like to preserve these settings for people that 'know' what
>> they're doing and are willing to take the risk, but clearly, when you
>> take the guard-rails off, things can come apart.
>
> sorry for the delay responding, these e-mails ended up in the spam folder
> somehow.
>
> I could add a new "avoid stupid things as root" flag for the perf_fuzzer.
>
> Besides this issue, are there other known things to skip?
>
> Generally running a fuzzer as root can be a bad idea which is why I don't
> test that use case very often.
> I think there were other issues in the past, like certain ftrace
> combinations being known to lock the system.
>
> Vince
>
It would be better if you could add such a flag to the perf_fuzzer. And I
have not found any other problems yet.
By the way. Use Non-root user to test is OK, and they do not have permission
to configure these parameters.
Thank you for your reply.
Xiaojun.
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-14 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-23 6:04 [PATCH] perf/core: Fix to check perf_cpu_time_max_percent Tan Xiaojun
2017-02-24 9:15 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/core: Fix the perf_cpu_time_max_percent check tip-bot for Tan Xiaojun
2017-02-25 8:10 ` Tan Xiaojun
2017-02-25 8:10 ` Tan Xiaojun
2017-02-25 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-25 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-27 0:36 ` Tan Xiaojun
2017-02-27 0:36 ` Tan Xiaojun
2017-03-13 18:35 ` Vince Weaver
2017-03-14 1:52 ` Tan Xiaojun [this message]
2017-04-15 7:58 ` [BUG arm64] OOPS when using /proc/kcore to disassemble the kernel symbols in "perf top" Tan Xiaojun
[not found] ` <58F1DE6A.7050307@huawei.com>
2017-04-19 4:14 ` [arm64] " Pratyush Anand
2017-04-19 8:01 ` Tan Xiaojun
2017-04-19 11:49 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-20 1:38 ` Tan Xiaojun
2017-04-21 5:46 ` Tan Xiaojun
2017-04-21 9:34 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-24 1:02 ` Tan Xiaojun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58C74CEA.4030402@huawei.com \
--to=tanxiaojun@huawei.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.