From: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>,
zhiyuan.lv@intel.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] x86/ioreq server: Release the p2m lock after mmio is handled.
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:18:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58D07F6E.6060708@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58D0196D02000078001454FD@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On 3/21/2017 1:03 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 18.03.17 at 11:53, <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> @@ -1870,18 +1870,14 @@ int hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(paddr_t gpa, unsigned long gla,
>> (npfec.write_access &&
>> (p2m_is_discard_write(p2mt) || (p2mt == p2m_ioreq_server))) )
>> {
>> - __put_gfn(p2m, gfn);
>> - if ( ap2m_active )
>> - __put_gfn(hostp2m, gfn);
>> -
>> rc = 0;
>> if ( unlikely(is_pvh_domain(currd)) )
>> - goto out;
>> + goto out_put_gfn;
> Did you forget to re-base onto staging before you've sent this?
> is_pvh_domain() was gone before your submission already. When
> re-basing, feel free to also drop the dead "rc = 0;" line.
Oops...
I did a rebase days ago, but did not send the patch directly. There were
some XenGT test performed based on these patch.
Sorry, I should have a check. Will resend the patch. :)
B.R.
Yu
> Jan
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-21 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-18 10:53 [PATCH v8 0/5] x86/ioreq server: Introduce HVMMEM_ioreq_server mem type Yu Zhang
2017-03-18 10:53 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] x86/ioreq server: Release the p2m lock after mmio is handled Yu Zhang
2017-03-20 17:03 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-21 1:18 ` Yu Zhang [this message]
2017-03-21 2:43 ` Yu Zhang
2017-03-18 10:53 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] x86/ioreq server: Add DMOP to map guest ram with p2m_ioreq_server to an ioreq server Yu Zhang
2017-03-18 10:53 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] x86/ioreq server: Handle read-modify-write cases for p2m_ioreq_server pages Yu Zhang
2017-03-18 10:53 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] x86/ioreq server: Asynchronously reset outstanding p2m_ioreq_server entries Yu Zhang
2017-03-18 10:53 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] x86/ioreq server: Synchronously reset outstanding p2m_ioreq_server entries when an ioreq server unmaps Yu Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58D07F6E.6060708@linux.intel.com \
--to=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=zhiyuan.lv@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.