From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id A408AE00AE4; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:29:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [198.47.19.16 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from fllnx209.ext.ti.com (fllnx209.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.16]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D6AE00A9B for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:29:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by fllnx209.ext.ti.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id v3PBT1tS010124 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 06:29:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1493119741; bh=kx/ta+pZlbUwWGPopK2BGCQswuA/qERazKS8bib7/Aw=; h=Subject:To:References:CC:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=IK38GTbDz2skeJ7m9WxhhJPlYGffLe39ig+pi7EH6vPiMXF72OU+cNjWcooerhpNM bV039LdXGYSppRy9kYoMy/L7gdAsp14VCpc6FaGEhMEXLQ5kML7i7dZqzJNPw7PdZ2 lbrtvFKmsUV1LfgYXG0KmkU/chglkSCYbZiRskhQ= Received: from dbdlxv05.itg.ti.com (dbdlxv05.itg.ti.com [172.24.171.60]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v3PBSs1u007974 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 06:28:55 -0500 Received: from DBDE72.ent.ti.com (dbde72.ent.ti.com [172.24.171.97]) by dbdlxv05.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v3PBSqbT013491 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 16:58:53 +0530 Received: from [172.24.159.169] (172.24.159.169) by DBDE72.ent.ti.com (172.24.171.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.294.0; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 16:58:51 +0530 To: Denys Dmytriyenko References: <1492784105-58653-1-git-send-email-a0393906@ti.com> <58FDF89D.3000509@ti.com> <20170424173559.GC24846@edge> From: Karthik Ramanan Message-ID: <58FF32F3.3030307@ti.com> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 16:58:51 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170424173559.GC24846@edge> X-Originating-IP: [172.24.159.169] Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [morty PATCH v2 1/3] ti-cgt-arm: add recipe for 16.9.2 X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:29:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Denys, I've taken care of your comments: * renamed the recipe to include the version name. * also made it native. Posted v3. Regards Karthik On 24-Apr-17 11:06 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 06:37:41PM +0530, Karthik Ramanan wrote: >> Jake, Denys - some questions for you. >> >>>> +PV = "16.9.2" >>> Would it be better to have this in the recipe filename? I'm not >> sure if there is a preference. >> Denys, what is the recommendation? I see both approaches, I can >> rework and submit if the PV should be included in the filename. > Depends on how often you plan to update the recipe and whether you will have > between-releases snapshots. That's usually the case with git-based components. > In case of tarball or binary-installer components, the convention is to use > the version in the filename. > > >>>> +BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk" >>> It appears that there is not support for the "target" class as the >> installer is for the x86 architecture. >> Just to be clear, would it be fine to just remove the nativesdk? > Are there plans to have ARM installer? If not, then "target" recipe with > BBCLASSEXTEND won't work - you just need to do a -native recipe directly. >