From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: gene.heskett@verizon.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BK PATCHES] ide-2.6 update
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:22:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58cb370e04102709221d6a9103@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200410271215.55472.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:15:55 -0400, Gene Heskett
<gene.heskett@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 October 2004 09:07, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >Please do a
> >
> > bk pull bk://bart.bkbits.net/ide-2.6
> >
> >This will update the following files:
> >
> > drivers/ide/ide-disk.c | 1 +
> > drivers/ide/ide-dma.c | 32
>
> Even after fixing the 4 wrapped lines in the patch, I'm not going in
> cleanly here:
>
> patching file drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 681.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> drivers/ide/ide-dma.c.rej
>
> The first 'grep' line of the patch is found at an offset of about +180
> lines in the original file.
>
> The rest of it seems to have found a home, but at offsets in excess of
> 159 lines for a few of them.
>
> This was against a 2.6.9 tree, and 2.6.9-mm1 failed in similar
> fashion. What src tree is this to be applied to?
current linus' -bk tree, latest -bk snapshot should also be OK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-27 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-27 13:07 [BK PATCHES] ide-2.6 update Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-27 13:34 ` CaT
2004-10-27 13:51 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-27 14:33 ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-10-27 14:49 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-30 3:47 ` PDC20267 bug and corruption (was: Re: [BK PATCHES] ide-2.6 update) CaT
2004-10-30 18:06 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-30 23:48 ` CaT
2004-10-27 14:29 ` [BK PATCHES] ide-2.6 update J.A. Magallon
2004-10-27 15:07 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-27 16:15 ` Gene Heskett
2004-10-27 16:22 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2004-10-27 17:05 ` Gene Heskett
2004-10-27 17:02 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-10-27 18:17 ` Gene Heskett
2004-10-27 17:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-27 18:19 ` Gene Heskett
2004-10-27 17:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-27 18:26 ` Gene Heskett
2004-10-27 18:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-27 19:03 ` Gene Heskett
2004-10-28 6:45 ` Gene Heskett
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-02 15:22 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-03-18 16:22 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-03-10 17:45 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-02-24 11:20 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-02-20 14:24 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-02-06 14:03 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-02-03 16:47 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-01-15 11:40 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-01-07 3:48 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-12-30 22:32 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-12-10 19:40 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-12-10 21:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-12-14 18:23 ` Enrico Scholz
2004-11-17 23:41 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-11-06 0:54 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-11-01 18:26 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-31 2:27 Kevin Freeman
2004-10-29 18:00 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-27 16:10 Chuck Ebbert
2004-10-27 16:18 ` Alan Cox
2004-10-27 18:58 ` Gene Heskett
2004-10-28 20:19 ` Eric Mudama
2004-10-30 15:48 ` tabris
2004-10-27 16:29 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-24 12:08 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-24 19:48 ` James Cloos
2004-10-24 20:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-24 20:51 ` James Cloos
2004-10-25 19:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-10-25 19:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-10-22 17:38 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-22 18:07 ` Russell King
2004-10-22 18:17 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-22 0:34 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-20 17:42 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-19 20:47 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-10 16:10 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-01 18:43 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-09-23 18:49 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58cb370e04102709221d6a9103@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.