From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch ide-dev 8/9] make ide_task_ioctl() use REQ_DRIVE_TASKFILE
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:09:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58cb370e050302020950da588a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42255878.7080908@pobox.com>
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 01:08:56 -0500, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Yes but it seems that you've assumed that ioctl == flagged taskfile
> > and fs/internal == normal taskfile which is _not_ what I aim for.
> >
> > I want fully-flagged taskfile handling like flagged_taskfile() and "hot path"
> > simpler taskfile handling like do_rw_taskfile() (at least for now - we can
> > remove "hot path" later) where both can be used for fs/internal/ioctl requests
> > (depending on the flags).
>
> There is no effective difference in performance between
>
> writeb()
> writeb()
> writeb()
> writeb()
>
> and
>
> if (bit 1)
> writeb()
> if (bit 2)
> writeb()
> if (bit 3)
> writeb()
> if (bit 4)
> writeb()
>
> The cost of a repeated bit test on the same unsigned long is _zero_.
> It's already in L1 cache. The I/Os are slow, and adding bit tests will
certainly it is not _zero_ ;-)
I agree that it is negligible compared to the cost of I/O
> not measurably decrease performance. (this is the reason why I do not
> object to using ioread32() and iowrite32()... it just adds a simple test)
>
> Plus, it is better to have a single path for all taskfiles, to ensure
> that the path is well-tested.
>
> libata's ->tf_load() and ->tf_read() hooks should be updated to use the
> more fine-grained flags that Tejun is proposing.
>
> Note that on SATA, this is largely irrelevant. The functions
> ata_tf_read() and ata_tf_load() should be updated for flagged taskfiles,
> because these will be used with PATA drivers.
>
> The hooks implemented in individual SATA drivers will not be updated.
> The reason is that SATA transmits an entire copy of the taskfile to/from
> the device all at once, in the form of a Frame Information Structure
> (FIS) -- essentially a SATA packet.
agreed
Tejun, one-path approach for IDE driver is fine with me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-02 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-24 14:48 [patch ide-dev 8/9] make ide_task_ioctl() use REQ_DRIVE_TASKFILE Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-02-27 7:36 ` Tejun Heo
2005-02-27 16:31 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-02-28 15:24 ` Tejun Heo
2005-02-28 16:14 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-03-01 4:21 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-01 5:29 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-01 8:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-03-01 9:29 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-01 9:59 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-03-02 6:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-02 10:09 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2005-03-02 19:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-02 14:20 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58cb370e050302020950da588a@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.