From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] Unexpected OOM instead of reclaiming inactive file pages
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 17:48:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5905724.LvFx2qVVIh@natalenko.name> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 969 bytes --]
Hello Damien.
I'm fairly confident that the following commit
459779d04ae8d block: Improve read ahead size for rotational devices
caused a regression in my test bench.
I'm running v6.17-rc1 in a small QEMU VM with virtio-scsi disk. It has got 1 GiB of RAM, so I can saturate it easily causing reclaiming mechanism to kick in.
If MGLRU is enabled:
$ echo 1000 | sudo tee /sys/kernel/mm/lru_gen/min_ttl_ms
then, once page cache builds up, an OOM happens without reclaiming inactive file pages: [1]. Note that inactive_file:506952kB, I'd expect these to be reclaimed instead, like how it happens with v6.16.
If MGLRU is disabled:
$ echo 0 | sudo tee /sys/kernel/mm/lru_gen/min_ttl_ms
then OOM doesn't occur, and things seem to work as usual.
If MGLRU is enabled, and 459779d04ae8d is reverted on top of v6.17-rc1, the OOM doesn't happen either.
Could you please check this?
Thank you.
--
Oleksandr Natalenko, MSE
[1]: https://paste.voidband.net/TG5OiZ29.log
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2025-08-11 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-11 15:48 Oleksandr Natalenko [this message]
2025-08-11 16:06 ` [REGRESSION][BISECTED] Unexpected OOM instead of reclaiming inactive file pages David Rientjes
2025-08-11 20:42 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2025-08-12 0:45 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-12 7:37 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5905724.LvFx2qVVIh@natalenko.name \
--to=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.