From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@apertussolutions.com>
Cc: scott.davis@starlab.io, christopher.clark@starlab.io,
"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
"Julien Grall" <julien@xen.org>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"Bertrand Marquis" <bertrand.marquis@arm.com>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Volodymyr Babchuk" <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
"Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/18] kconfig: allow configuration of maximum modules
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 11:32:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59114d3a-b9fe-1fb0-fac3-fe14fe4c505f@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220706210454.30096-2-dpsmith@apertussolutions.com>
On 06.07.2022 23:04, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/xen/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -17,3 +17,15 @@ config NR_CPUS
> For CPU cores which support Simultaneous Multi-Threading or similar
> technologies, this the number of logical threads which Xen will
> support.
> +
> +config NR_BOOTMODS
> + int "Maximum number of boot modules that a loader can pass"
> + range 1 32768
> + default "8" if X86
> + default "32" if ARM
Any reason for the larger default on Arm, irrespective of dom0less
actually being in use? (I'm actually surprised I can't spot a Kconfig
option controlling inclusion of dom0less. The default here imo isn't
supposed to depend on the architecture, but on whether dom0less is
supported. That way if another arch gained dom0less support, the
higher default would apply to it without needing further adjustment.)
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static multiboot_info_t __initdata mbi = {
> * The array size needs to be one larger than the number of modules we
> * support - see __start_xen().
> */
> -static module_t __initdata mb_modules[5];
> +static module_t __initdata mb_modules[CONFIG_NR_BOOTMODS + 1];
If the build admin selected 1, I'm pretty sure about nothing would work.
I think you want max(5, CONFIG_NR_BOOTMODS) or
max(4, CONFIG_NR_BOOTMODS) + 1 here and ...
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/guest/xen/pvh-boot.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/guest/xen/pvh-boot.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ bool __initdata pvh_boot;
> uint32_t __initdata pvh_start_info_pa;
>
> static multiboot_info_t __initdata pvh_mbi;
> -static module_t __initdata pvh_mbi_mods[8];
> +static module_t __initdata pvh_mbi_mods[CONFIG_NR_BOOTMOD + 1];
... max(8, CONFIG_NR_BOOTMODS) here (albeit the 8 may have room for
lowering - I don't recall why 8 was chosen rather than going with
the minimum possible value covering all module kinds known at that
time).
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-19 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-06 21:04 [PATCH v1 00/18] Hyperlaunch Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 01/18] kconfig: allow configuration of maximum modules Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-07 1:44 ` Henry Wang
2022-07-15 19:16 ` Julien Grall
2022-07-19 16:36 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-26 18:07 ` Julien Grall
2022-07-27 6:12 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-19 9:32 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2022-07-19 17:02 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-20 7:27 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-22 15:00 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 02/18] introduction of generalized boot info Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-15 19:25 ` Julien Grall
2022-07-20 18:32 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-19 13:11 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-21 14:28 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-21 16:00 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-21 16:00 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-22 16:01 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-25 7:05 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 03/18] x86: adopt new boot info structures Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-19 13:19 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-22 12:34 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 04/18] x86: refactor entrypoints to new boot info Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-18 13:58 ` Smith, Jackson
2022-07-22 12:59 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 05/18] x86: refactor xen cmdline into general framework Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-19 13:26 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-22 13:12 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-25 7:09 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 06/18] fdt: make fdt handling reusable across arch Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-07 1:44 ` Henry Wang
2022-07-19 9:36 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-22 13:18 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 07/18] docs: update hyperlaunch device tree documentation Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-18 13:57 ` Smith, Jackson
2022-07-22 13:34 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 08/18] kconfig: introduce domain builder config option Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-07 1:44 ` Henry Wang
2022-07-19 13:29 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-22 13:47 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 09/18] x86: introduce abstractions for domain builder Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-26 14:22 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 10/18] x86: introduce the " Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-18 13:59 ` Smith, Jackson
2022-07-22 14:36 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-22 20:33 ` Smith, Jackson
2022-07-23 10:45 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-26 14:46 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 11/18] x86: initial conversion to " Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-26 15:01 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 12/18] x86: convert dom0 creation " Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-27 12:25 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 13/18] x86: generalize physmap logic Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-27 12:33 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 14/18] x86: generalize vcpu for domain building Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-27 12:46 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 15/18] x86: rework domain page allocation Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-27 13:22 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 16/18] x86: add pv multidomain construction Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-27 14:12 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 17/18] builder: introduce domain builder hypfs tree Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-27 14:30 ` Jan Beulich
2022-07-06 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 18/18] tools: introduce example late pv helper Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-19 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 00/18] Hyperlaunch Smith, Jackson
2022-07-22 14:51 ` Daniel P. Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59114d3a-b9fe-1fb0-fac3-fe14fe4c505f@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
--cc=christopher.clark@starlab.io \
--cc=dpsmith@apertussolutions.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=scott.davis@starlab.io \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.