Re: [Makedumpfile PATCH V2] elf_info: fix file_size if segment is excluded

[Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>]

On 05/09/2017 at 09:53 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> I received following on a specific x86_64 hp virtual machine while
> executing `makedumpfile --mem-usage /proc/kcore`.
>
> vtop4_x86_64: Can't get a valid pte.
> readmem: Can't convert a virtual address(ffffffff88115860) to physical address.
> readmem: type_addr: 0, addr:ffffffff88115860, size:128
> get_nodes_online: Can't get the node online map.
>
> With some debug print in vtop4_x86_64() I noticed that pte value is read
> as 0, while crash reads the value correctly:
>
> from makedumpfile:
> vaddr=ffffffff88115860
> page_dir=59eaff8
> pml4=59ed067
> pgd_paddr=59edff0
> pgd_pte=59ee063
> pmd_paddr=59ee200
> pmd_pte=3642f063
> pte_paddr=3642f8a8
> pte=0
>
> from crash
> crash> vtop ffffffff88115860
> VIRTUAL           PHYSICAL
> ffffffff88115860  5b15860
>
> PML4 DIRECTORY: ffffffff87fea000
> PAGE DIRECTORY: 59ed067
>    PUD: 59edff0 => 59ee063
>    PMD: 59ee200 => 3642f063
>    PTE: 3642f8a8 => 5b15163
>   PAGE: 5b15000
>
> With some more debug prints in elf_info.c
>
> Before calling exclude_segment()
>
> LOAD (2)
>   phys_start : 100000
>   phys_end   : dfffd000
>   virt_start : ffff8a5a40100000
>   virt_end   : ffff8a5b1fffd000
>   file_offset: a5a40102000
>   file_size  : dfefd000
>
> exclude_segment() is called for Crash Kernel whose range is
> 2b000000-350fffff.
>
> We see following after exclude_segment()
>
> LOAD (2)
>   phys_start : 100000
>   phys_end   : 2affffff
>   virt_start : ffff8a5a40100000
>   virt_end   : ffff8a5a6affffff
>   file_offset: a5a40102000
>   file_size  : dfefd000
> LOAD (3)
>   phys_start : 35100000
>   phys_end   : dfffd000
>   virt_start : ffff8a5a75100000
>   virt_end   : ffff8a5b1fffd000
>   file_offset: a5a75102000
>   file_size  : 0
>
> Since file_size is calculated wrong therefore readpage_elf() does not
> behave correctly.
>
> This patch fixes above wrong behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
> ---
> v1->v2 : subtracted (end - start) from file_size as well
>
>  elf_info.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/elf_info.c b/elf_info.c
> index 8e2437622141..5494c4dcbebe 100644
> --- a/elf_info.c
> +++ b/elf_info.c
> @@ -826,9 +826,13 @@ static int exclude_segment(struct pt_load_segment **pt_loads,
>  				temp_seg.virt_end = vend;
>  				temp_seg.file_offset = (*pt_loads)[i].file_offset
>  					+ temp_seg.virt_start - (*pt_loads)[i].virt_start;
> +				temp_seg.file_size = temp_seg.phys_end
> +					- temp_seg.phys_start;
>  
>  				(*pt_loads)[i].virt_end = kvstart - 1;
>  				(*pt_loads)[i].phys_end =  start - 1;
> +				(*pt_loads)[i].file_size -= (temp_seg.file_size
> +					+ end - start);

Hi Pratyush,

Don't we need to move the "(*pt_loads)[i].file_size" minus "(end - start)" down
to the tail of "if (kvstart <  vend && kvend > vstart)" condition for all cases?

Regards,
Xunlei

>  
>  				tidx = i+1;
>  			} else if (kvstart != vstart) {


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec