From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: ast@fb.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] bpf: Make use of alignment information in check_val_ptr_alignment().
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 18:49:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59149629.4090109@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170511.120608.248672395765712270.davem@davemloft.net>
On 05/11/2017 06:06 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> We can validate PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ accesses in the same way that we
> do for PTR_TO_PACKET. The only difference is that we don't plug
> NET_IP_ALIGN into the equation.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index e74fb1b..cdbf282 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -823,10 +823,27 @@ static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
> }
>
> static int check_val_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
> - int size, bool strict)
> + int off, int size, bool strict)
> {
> - if (strict && size != 1) {
> - verbose("Unknown alignment. Only byte-sized access allowed in value access.\n");
> + int reg_off;
> +
> + /* Byte size accesses are always allowed. */
> + if (!strict || size == 1)
> + return 0;
> +
> + reg_off = reg->off;
> + if (reg->id) {
> + if (reg->aux_off_align % size) {
> + verbose("Value access is only %u byte aligned, %d byte access not allowed\n",
> + reg->aux_off_align, size);
> + return -EACCES;
> + }
> + reg_off += reg->aux_off;
> + }
This actually won't work, see also commit 79adffcd6489 ("bpf, verifier:
fix rejection of unaligned access checks for map_value_adj") with some
longer explanation. In case of map_value_adj, reg->id is always 0.
> + if ((reg_off + off) % size != 0) {
> + verbose("misaligned value access off %d+%d size %d\n",
> + reg_off, off, size);
> return -EACCES;
> }
>
> @@ -846,7 +863,7 @@ static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> case PTR_TO_PACKET:
> return check_pkt_ptr_alignment(reg, off, size, strict);
> case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ:
> - return check_val_ptr_alignment(reg, size, strict);
> + return check_val_ptr_alignment(reg, off, size, strict);
> default:
> if (off % size != 0) {
> verbose("misaligned access off %d size %d\n",
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-11 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-11 16:06 [PATCH v2 6/7] bpf: Make use of alignment information in check_val_ptr_alignment() David Miller
2017-05-11 16:49 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2017-05-11 17:23 ` David Miller
2017-05-11 17:53 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59149629.4090109@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.