From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: wporter82@gmail.com, sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com,
aquannie@gmail.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rts5208: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in rtsx_exclusive_enter_ss
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 09:05:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5934AE51.1040105@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170603085238.GA27539@kroah.com>
On 06/03/2017 04:52 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:43:35AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>> The driver may sleep under a spin lock, and the function call path is:
>> rtsx_exclusive_enter_ss (acquire the lock by spin_lock)
>> rtsx_enter_ss
>> rtsx_power_off_card
>> sd_cleanup_work
>> sd_stop_seq_mode
>> sd_switch_clock
>> sd_ddr_tuning
>> sd_ddr_pre_tuning_tx
>> sd_change_phase
>> wait_timeout
>> schedule_timeout --> may sleep
>>
>> To fix it, "wait_timeout" is replaced with mdelay in sd_change_phase.
> Nice work, how are you finding these bugs? What tools gives you this
> kind of analysis?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi,
I am very glad to get your praise on my work :)
I recently write a static analysis tool for detecting sleep-in-atomic
bugs, instead of using existing tools. One reason is that I have
encountered these bugs for some times when I writing drivers.
I am still improving my tool and detecting other similar bugs in Linux
kernel. If you have suggestions or comments on my work, please feel free
to contact me :)
Thanks,
Jia-Ju Bai
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-05 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-01 3:43 [PATCH] rts5208: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in rtsx_exclusive_enter_ss Jia-Ju Bai
2017-06-03 8:52 ` Greg KH
2017-06-05 1:05 ` Jia-Ju Bai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5934AE51.1040105@163.com \
--to=baijiaju1990@163.com \
--cc=aquannie@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
--cc=wporter82@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.