On 2017年06月17日 18:09, Christian König wrote:
The patch should still work on amd-staging-4.11, but drm-next has seen some changes on how the handles are stored for dma-buf.

This can potentially break the implementation and I think we need to adapt before pushing it upstream, but I'm not 100% sure.
Do you mean the patch needs to wait for next kernel promotion? 4.12? 4.13?

Regards,
David Zhou

Christian.

Am 16.06.2017 um 22:35 schrieb Alex Deucher:
The patches look good to me.  Christian what did you have in mind?
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>

Alex

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 4:08 AM, zhoucm1 <david1.zhou-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> wrote:
ping...?



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: upsteam find bo api
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 18:16:24 +0800
From: zhoucm1 <david1.zhou-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
To: amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org


Hi all,

Since patches are one feature, and contain kernel and libdrm, I attached 
them not by send-mail. Hope not inconvenience.

0001-drm-amdgpu-return-bo-itself-if-userptr-is-cpu-addr-o.patch is 
kernel patch.
Other three is libdrm patches including unit test.

please review.

Regards,
David Zhou




_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx