From: jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI: rockchip: fix system hang up if activate CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:25:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <598C267D.1060105@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0499138-aa92-a0bb-1032-7112a025257e@rock-chips.com>
Hi shawn,
On 08/10/2017 05:14 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
> Hi Jeffy
>
> On 2017/8/10 16:39, jeffy wrote:
>> Hi shawn,
>>
>> On 08/10/2017 04:21 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
>>> With CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ enabled, the irq tear down routine
>>> would still access the irq handler registed as a shard irq.
>>> Per the comment within the function of __free_irq, it says
>>> "It's a shared IRQ -- the driver ought to be prepared for
>>> an IRQ event to happen even now it's being freed". However
>>> when failing to probe the driver, it may disable the clock
>>> for accessing the register and the following check for shared
>>> irq state would call the irq handler which accesses the register
>>> w/o the clk enabled. That will hang the system forever.
>>
>> i think this extra irq call is to make sure it's safe to get a shared
>> irq when we are freeing it, and we would not get this irq after freed it.
>>
>> so maybe just call devm_free_irq before disable clks(and other
>> required resources for the irq handler)? and also do it in the
>> rockchip_pcie_remove.
>
> That works since we free it and the following devm_irq_release would
> bail out early. But I know sure if it is the real intention of the
> devm_ irq stuff, although devm_free_irq should be called to free the
> IRQ separately if we want. At least that is so explicit that folks will
> know that, as more from the top view, it seems only a little drivers
> there call devm_free_irq for this case by looking into some more
> drivers(Still no any PCIe drivers do that).
>
> Not sure if their systems are robust enough that could access the
> register w/o clk, even without power domain enabled.
maybe we can use request_irq & free_irq directly?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-10 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-10 8:21 [RFC PATCH] PCI: rockchip: fix system hang up if activate CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ Shawn Lin
2017-08-10 8:39 ` jeffy
2017-08-10 8:39 ` jeffy
2017-08-10 9:14 ` Shawn Lin
2017-08-10 9:25 ` jeffy [this message]
2017-08-10 9:27 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-08-10 9:40 ` jeffy
2017-08-10 11:04 ` Shawn Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=598C267D.1060105@rock-chips.com \
--to=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.