Re: [RFC PATCH v4 8/8] docs: armproposa: l to add separate SCMI node for Xen agent

[Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>]

Hi,

On 30/06/2025 12:57, Oleksii Moisieiev wrote:
> KVM [1] is not applicable here as it starts under/inside Linux, so it
> doesn't have direct access to SCMI, the Linux does.
> And Linux will see only one SCMI transport (Agent).
> Seems, the only option possible is virtio-scmi (qemu) - the virtio-scmi
> potentially can simulate multi-channel,
 > but this is out if scope of this work.
> QNX [0] relies on configuration files rather than the Device Tree.
To clarify, I didn't ask to implement anything in KVM or QNX. I asked to 
write the bindings in a way that they are not Xen specific to give a 
chance to for other to re-use them. Yes today KVM and QNX would not use 
them... But I also still don't see why we should actively prevent them 
to use the bindings you come up with...

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall