From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amit Subject: Requesting to change "doesn't" to "does not", isn't to "is not". Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:32:54 +0530 Message-ID: <5996d771.55a0620a.fbbfc.bd23@mx.google.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.83.47]:33840 "EHLO mail-pg0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751586AbdHRMC6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:02:58 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id u185so63009155pgb.1 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 05:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from amitkuma.pnq.csb ([125.16.97.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r82sm12942713pfe.0.2017.08.18.05.02.56 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 05:02:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" Hello, I believe coding guidelines does not speak about this. But PR (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/16705) talks on it. And its still open. If we donot agree on contractions, Let's close it. Though "I am" instead of "I'm" -- both are completely correct English. But I read on PR, It suits more on ESL speakers and takes care of non-english speakers. I believe while reviewing the PRs, we can ask developers for changing "isn't" to "is not". [If we accept above PR?] Would be a step in including "Strong Phrases, Active voices" into documentation/Comments/std output.. What's your thought on it? -- Thanks Amit Kumar