From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jeffy Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Add a sanity check before using dai driver name Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:29:42 +0800 Message-ID: <599E4826.1060607@rock-chips.com> References: <20170822144512.12976-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <20170822161756.5h6smkjz6kkvl5i7@sirena.org.uk> <599CC17F.90806@rock-chips.com> <20170823110628.xergjdexrmxyqrza@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170823110628.xergjdexrmxyqrza@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tiwai@suse.de, dolinux.peng@gmail.com, Jaroslav Kysela , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai , Liam Girdwood List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi Mark, On 08/23/2017 07:06 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 07:42:55AM +0800, jeffy wrote: > >> >i think the original check is allowing NULL dlc dai_name to be a match... >> >so we basically did: >> >reject when dlc dai_name is valid, but not match the dai name > So it is, but this still looks like the wrong thing - it'll match on an > empty DAI name over an explicit match on the driver name which seems > like it's the wrong way round. > sorry, i don't know much about asoc, so i just trying to keep the original conditions and add the new one on it :) the original one is: if (dlc->dai_name && strcmp(dai->name, dlc->dai_name)) continue; and i was trying to do something like: if (dlc->dai_name && strcmp(dai->name, dlc->dai_name) && (!dai->driver->name || strcmp(dai->driver->name, dlc->dai_name))) continue; which is add an accept case for: dai driver name is valid and matches the dai name we are looking for...