From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Message-ID: <599F7433.4070606@rock-chips.com> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 08:49:55 +0800 From: jeffy MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bjorn Helgaas CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, briannorris@chromium.org, Will Deacon , dianders@chromium.org, Rob Herring , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Kaehlcke , Klaus Goger , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Caesar Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: rockchip: Move PCIE_WAKE handling into rockchip pcie driver References: <20170822031934.8675-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <20170824165505.GM31858@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> In-Reply-To: <20170824165505.GM31858@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed List-ID: Hi Bjorn, On 08/25/2017 12:55 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Looking for acks from Shawn and Rob... > > And I'm not sure about the DT wake IRQ description. That seems like it > could potentially be generic than this Rockchip-specific proposal. > > it looks like shawn already take the error handling patch into his series, so i'll remove that one in my next version. i'll wait for those error handling patches to land, then rebase and resend this wake irq patches, thanks:) > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jeffy Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: rockchip: Move PCIE_WAKE handling into rockchip pcie driver Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 08:49:55 +0800 Message-ID: <599F7433.4070606@rock-chips.com> References: <20170822031934.8675-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <20170824165505.GM31858@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170824165505.GM31858-1RhO1Y9PlrlHTL0Zs8A6p5iNqAH0jzoTYJqu5kTmcBRl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Mark Rutland , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Heiko Stuebner , linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org, briannorris-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, Will Deacon , dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Matthias Kaehlcke , Klaus Goger , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Caesar Wang List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org Hi Bjorn, On 08/25/2017 12:55 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Looking for acks from Shawn and Rob... > > And I'm not sure about the DT wake IRQ description. That seems like it > could potentially be generic than this Rockchip-specific proposal. > > it looks like shawn already take the error handling patch into his series, so i'll remove that one in my next version. i'll wait for those error handling patches to land, then rebase and resend this wake irq patches, thanks:) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com (jeffy) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 08:49:55 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: rockchip: Move PCIE_WAKE handling into rockchip pcie driver In-Reply-To: <20170824165505.GM31858@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> References: <20170822031934.8675-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <20170824165505.GM31858@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Message-ID: <599F7433.4070606@rock-chips.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Bjorn, On 08/25/2017 12:55 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Looking for acks from Shawn and Rob... > > And I'm not sure about the DT wake IRQ description. That seems like it > could potentially be generic than this Rockchip-specific proposal. > > it looks like shawn already take the error handling patch into his series, so i'll remove that one in my next version. i'll wait for those error handling patches to land, then rebase and resend this wake irq patches, thanks:) >