From: jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dbasehore@chromium.org,
dianders@chromium.org, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CHROMIUM: devfreq: rk3399: Clear edev->dev drvdata before enabling dfi
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 09:51:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59AA0EAD.3030305@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170902004659.GA105370@google.com>
hi brian,
On 09/02/2017 08:47 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 07:52:37AM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
>> Currently we are using edev->dev drvdata to get rk3399-dmc data, but
>> it would be inited to edev in devfreq_event_add_edev.
>>
>> So we need to clear the edev->dev drvdata before enabling dfi, to
>> prevent dfi from getting the wrong rk3399-dmc data when the irq
>> triggered too early.
>
> Your description doesn't match your code. You say you're clearing
> evdev->dev driver data but...
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
>> index 1b89ebbad02c..12f9f03f349f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
>> @@ -429,6 +429,7 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> rk3399_devfreq_dmc_profile.initial_freq = data->rate;
>>
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>
> ...here you're only clearing the drvdata for the platform device. Is
> that a mistake? (Hint: that's not what you uploaded on the Chromium OS
> instance, where you presumably tested this.)
>
> And if you're really trying to do what your commit message says:
>
> We're having two different files fight over who owns the edev drvdata?
> That seems like a big no-no.
>
> We should work out who's the real owner of 'drvdata', and find some
> other solution for the others.
sorry, indeed...it turns out the upstream dmc driver is not using
dfi(it's simple_onfemand below ;)...
so we don't need thus patch for upstream kernel...or maybe we should
submit other cros patches(contains the one causes this issue, and this
patch)
>
> Brian
>
>> data->devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(dev,
>> &rk3399_devfreq_dmc_profile,
>> "simple_ondemand",
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>>
>>
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-02 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-01 23:52 [PATCH] CHROMIUM: devfreq: rk3399: Clear edev->dev drvdata before enabling dfi Jeffy Chen
2017-09-02 0:47 ` Brian Norris
2017-09-02 1:51 ` jeffy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59AA0EAD.3030305@rock-chips.com \
--to=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=dbasehore@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.