From: mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com (Mathias Nyman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2][for 4.14] xhci: allow TRACE to work with EVENT ring dequeue
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:59:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59C8D37B.6080505@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1506110113-21707-1-git-send-email-awallis@codeaurora.org>
On 22.09.2017 22:55, Adam Wallis wrote:
> inc_deq() currently bails earlier for EVENT rings than the common return
> point of the function, due to the fact that EVENT rings do not have
> link TRBs. The unfortunate side effect of this is that the very useful
> trace_xhci_inc_deq() function is not called/usable for EVENT ring
> debug.
True, makes sense to trace the event ring deq ptr as well.
>
> This patch provides a refactor by removing the multiple return exit
> points into a single return which additionally allows for all rings to
> use the trace function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Wallis <awallis@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2: undo accidental line removal at end of patch
>
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> index a944365..3960ba9 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> @@ -171,23 +171,23 @@ static void inc_deq(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_ring *ring)
> if (ring->type == TYPE_EVENT) {
> if (!last_trb_on_seg(ring->deq_seg, ring->dequeue)) {
> ring->dequeue++;
> - return;
> + } else {
> + if (last_trb_on_ring(ring, ring->deq_seg,
> + ring->dequeue))
> + ring->cycle_state ^= 1;
> + ring->deq_seg = ring->deq_seg->next;
> + ring->dequeue = ring->deq_seg->trbs;
> + }
> + } else {
> + /* All other rings have link trbs */
> + if (!trb_is_link(ring->dequeue)) {
> + ring->dequeue++;
> + ring->num_trbs_free++;
> + }
> + while (trb_is_link(ring->dequeue)) {
> + ring->deq_seg = ring->deq_seg->next;
> + ring->dequeue = ring->deq_seg->trbs;
The added level of indentation makes it a little bit messier.
How about just using goto out; instead of return?
out:
trace_xhci_inc_deq(ring);
-Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-25 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-22 19:55 [PATCH v2][for 4.14] xhci: allow TRACE to work with EVENT ring dequeue Adam Wallis
2017-09-25 9:59 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2017-09-25 12:02 ` Adam Wallis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59C8D37B.6080505@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.