All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, alawang <alan.1.wang@nokia-sbell.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: dynamic: fix memory leak related to properties of __of_node_dup
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 17:59:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59E1615F.50901@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqK0pc6sL+YR2U-J44fvwKivmxiULD5uc7bzTMEOZ_LKXg@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/13/17 13:47, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:42 PM, alawang <alan.1.wang@nokia-sbell.com> wrote:
>> It is possible a node was dynamically allocated but without any
>> property. The properies will be got from devices and added to the
>> node when devices got connected.
>> When release this node, all properties of which had been moved to
>> deadprops.
>> In this case, the properties in the deadprops list are never
>> deallocated.
> 
> This is not new, right? Do you actually hit this case? If so, how?
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: alawang <alan.1.wang@nokia-sbell.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/of/dynamic.c | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/dynamic.c b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
>> index 301b6db..465d43b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
>> @@ -335,6 +335,10 @@ void of_node_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>>         if (!of_node_check_flag(node, OF_DYNAMIC))
>>                 return;
>>
>> +       if (!prop) {
>> +               prop = node->deadprops;
>> +               node->deadprops = NULL;
>> +       }
>>         while (prop) {
>>                 struct property *next = prop->next;
>>                 kfree(prop->name);
>> --
>> 2.6.2
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

The code looks right to me.  The patch description is confusing to me.

If a node with no properties is dynamically added, then a property is
dynamically added to the node, then the property is dynamically removed,
the result will be node->properties == NULL and node->deadprops != NULL.

Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-14  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-13  1:42 [PATCH] of: dynamic: fix memory leak related to properties of __of_node_dup alawang
2017-10-13  1:42 ` alawang
2017-10-17  4:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Lixin Wang
2017-10-17  4:20   ` Lixin Wang
2017-10-19  9:40 ` [PATCH v3] " Lixin Wang
2017-10-19  9:40   ` Lixin Wang
2017-10-19 23:26   ` Frank Rowand
     [not found]     ` <59E934A1.9060304-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-10-19 23:34       ` frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
2017-10-19 23:34         ` frowand.list
     [not found] ` <1507858967-40416-1-git-send-email-alan.1.wang-FTnzSCDXTkYjo0HpFSRKWA@public.gmane.org>
2017-10-13  3:25   ` [PATCH] " Lixin Wang
2017-10-13  3:25     ` Lixin Wang
2017-10-13 20:47   ` Rob Herring
2017-10-13 20:47     ` Rob Herring
2017-10-14  0:59     ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2017-10-16  4:35       ` Wang, Alan 1. (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)
     [not found]       ` <59E1615F.50901-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-10-17 14:03         ` Rob Herring
2017-10-17 14:03           ` Rob Herring
2017-10-20  1:59   ` [PATCH v4] " Lixin Wang
2017-10-20  1:59     ` Lixin Wang
     [not found]     ` <1508464749-54218-1-git-send-email-alan.1.wang-FTnzSCDXTkYjo0HpFSRKWA@public.gmane.org>
2017-10-20 18:12       ` Rob Herring
2017-10-20 18:12         ` Rob Herring
2017-10-23  3:19 ` [PATCH v5] " Lixin Wang
2017-10-23  3:19   ` Lixin Wang
2017-10-23  5:16   ` Frank Rowand
2017-10-23 16:47     ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59E1615F.50901@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan.1.wang@nokia-sbell.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.