From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jeffy Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 4/7] of/irq: Adjust of pci irq parsing for multiple interrupts Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:05:03 +0800 Message-ID: <59F2944F.9060208@rock-chips.com> References: <20171026132840.20946-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <20171026132840.20946-5-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from regular1.263xmail.com ([211.150.99.134]:59553 "EHLO regular1.263xmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932328AbdJ0CFY (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 22:05:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Rob Herring Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Tony Lindgren , Shawn Lin , Brian Norris , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Doug Anderson , Frank Rowand , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Hi Rob, On 10/27/2017 04:02 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > Why do you need this patch? You're moving the wakeup handling from the > PCI device to the bridge. The bridge device is not PCI interrupts, but > a platform device so this function doesn't matter. > because it's possible we have multiple PCI devices with individual WAKE# interrupt. so Brian suggested we may need to support both of PCI device wakeup handling and the bridge wakeup handling in the pci core(as the ACPI) :) > Rob > > >