From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Nagarjuna Kristam <nkristam@nvidia.com>,
Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: tegra186: Add missing CPU PMUs
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:27:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59f8937f14ce485558ec957d0f73ba7d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201110182212.GI2297135@ulmo>
On 2020-11-10 18:22, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 06:08:31PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 2020-11-10 17:36, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:58:51AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> > > Add the description of CPU PMUs for both the Denver and A57 clusters,
>> > > which enables the perf subsystem.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > >
>> > > + pmu_denver {
>> > > + compatible = "nvidia,denver-pmu", "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
>> >
>> > checkpatch complains that this isn't documented. Did I miss the DT
>> > bindings patch or do we not have one for this?
>>
>> We don't. But I don't think adding a compatible string for each
>> and every micro-architecture makes much sense unless we have something
>> useful to add to that compatible string. Such as a full description
>> of the implementation specific events.
>
> I'm wondering if this isn't going to upset Rob's json-schema bot and
> make him mad.
Rob going mad? Never! ;-)
If you *really* want it, I'll respin this patch with the Denver
compatible
added to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.yaml.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-10 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-13 9:58 [PATCH] arm64: tegra186: Add missing CPU PMUs Marc Zyngier
2020-11-10 17:36 ` Thierry Reding
2020-11-10 18:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-10 18:22 ` Thierry Reding
2020-11-10 18:27 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59f8937f14ce485558ec957d0f73ba7d@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nkristam@nvidia.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=skomatineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.