From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: add a new bit check for IC_CON control
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 11:38:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59fbf54d-9bbc-efaa-bb2a-74880156e310@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230116043500.413499-1-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Hi
On 1/16/23 06:35, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> On some AMD platforms, based on the new designware datasheet,
> BIOS sets the BIT(11) within the IC_CON register to advertise
> the "bus clear feature capability".
>
> Since the current driver implementation completely ignores what
> is advertised by BIOS, we just build the master_cfg and
> overwrite the entire thing into IC_CON during
> i2c_dw_configure_master().
>
> Since, the bus clear feature is not enabled, sometimes there is
> no way to reset if the BIT(11) is not set.
>
> AMD/Designware datasheet says:
>
> Bit(11) BUS_CLEAR_FEATURE_CTRL. Read-write,Volatile. Reset: 0.
> Description: In Master mode:
> - 1'b1: Bus Clear Feature is enabled.
> - 1'b0: Bus Clear Feature is Disabled.
> In Slave mode, this register bit is not applicable.
>
> Hence add a check in i2c_dw_configure_master() that if the BIOS
> advertises the bus clear feature, let driver not ignore it and
> adapt accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h | 1 +
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
Is this change alone enough? I understood from the specification that
the SCL/SDA stuck low timeout registers should be set and a bus recovery
procedure (additional code) is required.
Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-16 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-16 4:35 [PATCH] i2c: designware: add a new bit check for IC_CON control Shyam Sundar S K
2023-01-16 9:38 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2023-01-17 10:31 ` Shyam Sundar S K
2023-01-17 10:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-01-17 11:21 ` Jarkko Nikula
2023-01-17 11:39 ` Shyam Sundar S K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59fbf54d-9bbc-efaa-bb2a-74880156e310@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jsd@semihalf.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.