From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39994) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQpgh-0002dx-7P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 02:18:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQpgd-0006N8-8T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 02:18:11 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:2054 helo=huawei.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQpgc-0006Hp-Rx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 02:18:07 -0500 Message-ID: <5A376B8D.5080008@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:17:33 +0800 From: Shannon Zhao MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20171201105622.GB26237@yangzhon-Virtual> <74cccd14-e485-90d4-82d9-03355c05faca@redhat.com> <20171204120322.GA32151@yangzhon-Virtual> <5A253EF5.6040300@huawei.com> <20171205060047.GA4102@yangzhon-Virtual> <024fd897-a16a-f69e-94dc-07affb3ef724@redhat.com> <20171206092625.GA19639@yangzhon-Virtual> <6bfac215-b5ba-fd09-d17b-310a2c843a2b@redhat.com> <20171207150629.GA7387@yangzhon-Virtual> <20171212065419.GB26607@yangzhon-Virtual> In-Reply-To: <20171212065419.GB26607@yangzhon-Virtual> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] rcu: reduce more than 7MB heap memory by malloc_trim() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Yang Zhong , Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com, weidong.huang@huawei.com, arei.gonglei@huawei.com, liujunjie23@huawei.com, wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com, stone.xulei@huawei.com On 2017/12/12 14:54, Yang Zhong wrote: >> > 2) what effect it has on boot time in Shannon's case. > Hello Shannon, > > It's hard for me to reproduce your commands in my x86 enviornment, as a compare test, > would you please help me use above two TEMP patches to verify VM bootup time again? > > Those data can help Paolo to decide which patch will be used or how to adjust delta > parameter. Many thanks! We have tested these two patches. Both don't increase the VM bootup time in my case. Thanks, -- Shannon