All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dave.long@linaro.org (David Long)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: kprobes: Remove unneeded address sanity check
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:08:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A84EB83.7070807@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180201093459.20477-2-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>

On 02/01/2018 04:34 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
>
> Remove unneeded address sanity check in arch_prepare_kprobe().
> Since do_debug_exception() is already blacklisted for kprobes, no need
> to reject all __exception functions. Also, since generic kprobe
> framework already ensures the address is in kernel text, no need to
> check it is in rodata again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 8 --------
>   1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index d849d9804011..3c487a389252 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -78,8 +78,6 @@ static void __kprobes arch_simulate_insn(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
>   int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>   {
>   	unsigned long probe_addr = (unsigned long)p->addr;
> -	extern char __start_rodata[];
> -	extern char __end_rodata[];
>
>   	if (probe_addr & 0x3)
>   		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -87,12 +85,6 @@ int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>   	/* copy instruction */
>   	p->opcode = le32_to_cpu(*p->addr);
>
> -	if (in_exception_text(probe_addr))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	if (probe_addr >= (unsigned long) __start_rodata &&
> -	    probe_addr <= (unsigned long) __end_rodata)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>   	/* decode instruction */
>   	switch (arm_kprobe_decode_insn(p->addr, &p->ainsn)) {
>   	case INSN_REJECTED:	/* insn not supported */
>

I have tested this change on v4.15 using kprobes events and I find it 
allows kprobes to be placed in exception text when they were previously 
rejected. Is there some other recent change I need to test this with for 
the previous behavior to be preserved?

-dl

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-15  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-01  9:34 [PATCH 0/2] lkdtm: fix irq handler entry for arm64 AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-01  9:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: kprobes: Remove unneeded address sanity check AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-06 14:36   ` Will Deacon
2018-02-07  0:02     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-02-15  2:08   ` David Long [this message]
2018-02-15  6:47     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-02-22  5:19       ` David Long
2018-02-22  5:45         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-02-01  9:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] lkdtm: fix irq handler entry for arm64 AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-27  3:57   ` Kees Cook
2018-02-27  5:07     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-02-27  7:20     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-27 15:46       ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5A84EB83.7070807@linaro.org \
    --to=dave.long@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.